Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • webappl
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 5

    problem for bismark_methylation_extractor coverage output

    I run bismark (v0.10.0) to analyse a single end directional methylation sequence dataset with the following commands:

    (1) prepare genome file
    bismark_genome_preparation --path_to_bowtie /opt/bowtie/ --verbose ./genomes/calbicans
    (2) align with bismark
    bismark -n 1 -l 50 --path_to_bowtie /opt/bowtie ./genomes/calbicans/ calbican1.fastq
    (3) extract coverage report
    bismark_methylation_extractor -s --bedGraph --counts calbican1.fastq_bismark.sam

    The final calbican1.fastq_bismark.bismark.cov file reports very weird results. I list here the first 10 lines from the bismark.cov
    Contig3 67 67 0 0 4
    Contig3 153 153 0 0 2
    Contig3 154 154 0 0 126
    Contig3 171 171 0 0 2
    Contig3 172 172 0 0 301
    Contig3 280 280 0 0 1303
    Contig3 308 308 0 0 2
    Contig3 309 309 0 0 1380
    Contig3 323 323 0 0 3
    Contig3 324 324 0 0 1459

    As you can see, unexpected outpus appear at positions 154, 172, 309 and 324. The large unmethylation count at position 280 is also suspicious. Looks like bismark messed up strand/direction.

    What could be the problem occurring here?

    Thanks.
    Last edited by webappl; 10-24-2013, 04:34 AM.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    It's not clear from that that bismark did anything wrong in counting things. Have you looked at the aligned reads in IGV? Without seeing the raw alignments, we sort of have to assume that those numbers are correct.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    33 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    38 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
    0 responses
    43 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...