Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wmseq
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 71

    Do I need adding 1 pseudocount (prevent dividing by 0)?

    Hi every one,
    I am wandering if I need adding 1 or 0.1 pseudocount to prevent dividing by 0 for edgeR analysis, after absent genes were removed from my count file. Hope to get your advice.
    Thanks a lot!
    Richard
    Last edited by wmseq; 11-08-2013, 01:34 PM.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    I guess it depends on what you're doing that having an infinite ratio is problematic.

    Comment

    • wmseq
      Member
      • May 2011
      • 71

      #3
      Devon,
      glad to meet you again, thanks a lot!
      As you know, after the acount table for rnaseq analysis is created, the absent genes, ambigous genes,.. should be remove from the table. It seems that another step, adding 1 or 0.1 to the zero of a gene count in a sample, is needed. I don't know its purpose, so send this question on the furm.
      Last edited by wmseq; 11-08-2013, 01:44 PM.

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        Ah yeah, it's pretty rare that you really need to do that. As a general rule, don't muck with the counts table unless you really need to.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...