Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lyn Hsiong
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 14

    #1

    How to use codeml to calculate ω ratios of internal branches "iteratively"

    Hi, my dear guys, I have a question about ω ratio calculation by codeml for my specific purpose.

    I have constructed a ML tree (for a gene family), and I only focus on the substitutions along the internal branches of the tree.

    Using user-specified branch model in codeml could calculate the substitution rates and ω ratios for the internal branches of the whole tree or a specific clades. However, here, I want to calculate the ω ratios of the internal branches connecting the terminal leaves and/or other internal nodes among which nucleotide divergences are less than a specific threshold, like 5%, 10%, 15%, 25%... For different threshholds, it will be better to use loops of pragramming languages.

    That is to say, suppose a tree contains three major binary clades ((A:0.125, B:0.125), C:0.175), and every clade contains many short binary branches (mean length, 0.03; range, 0.01-0.05). So, for each clade, divergences are from 0.02 to 0.10; for the whole tree, divergences are from 0.02 to 0.35. When I focus on all the sub-clades containing sequences among which divegences are less than 0.05 (these seqences may be from A, B, and C, respectively), I can specify a foreground ω value for all the internal branches of the focused sub-clades; and when I set the threshold to 0.35, the estimated ω represents the value from the all the internal branches of the whole tree. These values for different thresholds are what I want to calculate, but in practice I can hardly find any rules to mark the foreground #1 to the right branches in the tree file in batch.

    My tree have a more complex situation, at least it has much more branches. So I need some good ideas to solve the problem using perl, or other tools.

    All of your comments are welcome! Thanks in advance....
  • lindenb
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 143

    #2
    cross-posted on biostars: http://www.biostars.org/p/86471

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2




      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
      Yesterday, 06:46 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    71 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...