Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yasu
    Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 10

    cuffcompare output statistic

    I got cuffcompare output something like below:

    ==================
    # Query mRNAs : 250371 in 250079 loci (24778 multi-exon transcripts)
    # (282 multi-transcript loci, ~1.0 transcripts per locus)
    # Reference mRNAs : 39609 in 25783 loci (31869 multi-exon)
    # Corresponding super-loci: 14405
    #--------------------| Sn | Sp | fSn | fSp
    Base level: 53.1 38.8 - -
    Exon level: 0.7 0.5 20.3 15.7
    Intron level: 0.0 0.0 12.6 74.2
    Intron chain level: 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3
    Transcript level: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Locus level: 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
    Missed exons: 97628/219296 ( 44.5%)
    Wrong exons: 164116/283022 ( 58.0%)
    Missed introns: 163909/193288 ( 84.8%)
    Wrong introns: 5780/32915 ( 17.6%)
    Missed loci: 10965/25783 ( 42.5%)
    Wrong loci: 154875/250079 ( 61.9%)

    Total union super-loci across all datasets: 170453
    (0 multi-transcript, ~0.0 transcripts per locus)
    ==================

    I'd like to know the meaning of each statistic. Specifically, can I think that this data covers 14818 loci (calculated from 25783-10965 as shown in "Missed loci") at least one read?

    I tried to look around related thread, but I cannot find out. Sorry for redundant thread if there are already related ones.

    Thanks in advance.

    -Yasu
  • sterding
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 36

    #2
    I have the same question. The 'base-level' Sn/Sp is reasonablly high, while the exon-level Sn/Sp is very low. Why like this?

    Comment

    • Yt Shen
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 3

      #3
      Dear sterding and yasu,

      Did any of you get the information about the topic you talk about above? I also confused about it.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Pathogen Surveillance with Advanced Genomic Tools
        by seqadmin




        The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for proactive pathogen surveillance systems. As ongoing threats like avian influenza and newly emerging infections continue to pose risks, researchers are working to improve how quickly and accurately pathogens can be identified and tracked. In a recent SEQanswers webinar, two experts discussed how next-generation sequencing (NGS) and machine learning are shaping efforts to monitor viral variation and trace the origins of infectious...
        03-24-2025, 11:48 AM
      • seqadmin
        New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
        by seqadmin


        This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

        The Headliner
        The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
        03-03-2025, 01:39 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
      0 responses
      41 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
      0 responses
      47 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
      0 responses
      191 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...