Hi, we're increasing the size of the genomes we're assembling using GAII reads. Our old assembly server had an SMP architecture and worked fairly well but was limited in its RAM (96GB). With assemblers such as Velvet we're looking to move up to a 256GB RAM solution and had considered the Dell R910 (1TB Max RAM), Sunfire x4640 and HP DL785.
However to varying degrees these are all NUMA solutions with banks of RAM associated with a specific CPU/CPUs. I am a little concerned about the possibility of high latency where a single threaded process needs to access close to the entire contents of RAM. Essentially it seems a lot of the data would have to pass through several memory bridges before arriving at the active core with the consequent risk of a stalled CPU pipeline.
Cold anyone comment on whether this should be a concern or whether technologies such as quickpath can essentially get around this?
Thanks for your thoughts.
However to varying degrees these are all NUMA solutions with banks of RAM associated with a specific CPU/CPUs. I am a little concerned about the possibility of high latency where a single threaded process needs to access close to the entire contents of RAM. Essentially it seems a lot of the data would have to pass through several memory bridges before arriving at the active core with the consequent risk of a stalled CPU pipeline.
Cold anyone comment on whether this should be a concern or whether technologies such as quickpath can essentially get around this?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Comment