is there some strategy to follow
-
-
There is no rigorous defined method for selecting an outgroup. You obviously want something that is not part of your ingroup but is not so distantly related that inferred homology is difficult or practically impossible.
As to the first criterion, that depends entirely on what your ingroup actually is and the diversity it already covers.
So one way to pick an outgroup for sequence data would be to build a tree with just your ingroup sequences. Take your most divergent branch from that, and do a BLAST search to find something that clearly is not part of your ingroup sequence family, but still retains some evidence of clear homology to them.
Or, if you are inferring an organismal tree, you can just do a literature search for a potential common ancestor to your ingroup, and then pull a sequence for a member of that taxon from available databases.Michael Black, Ph.D.
ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.
-
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...10-14-2026, 09:55 AM -
Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.
We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing...
Comment