Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kitinje
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 7

    isoforms.fpkm_tracking also contains genes?

    Hello,

    I can't solve a problem with my cufflinks/cuffnorm output.
    I'm using gencode v19 GTF file. Read were aligned to genome using STAR.

    I have problems with the output in isoforms.fpkm_tracking file.
    While I have a correct genes.fpkm_tracking output where only the genes are listed, in isoforms.fpkm_tracking I have both the transcripts (ENST*) AND the genes (ENSG*) listed and quantified.
    But fpkm values of the genes are not the sum of the single isoforms, and in some cases transcripts have higher fpkm values then the associated genes.

    Why do you think this happens?
    Thank you
    Marco
  • lch
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 1

    #2
    Hi Marco,

    I encountered the same problem as you when I was trying to use cuffnorm on gencode v19 gtf file. There could be two issues.

    1. There are some additional fields that are required by cuffdiff/cuffnorm. They can be added using cuffcompare according to the cufflinks manual page.

    2. Somehow cuffnorm does not recognize the entries for genes in the gtf file (3rd field as "gene"). It will treat these entries as transcripts. Perhaps you can remove them first.

    Hope this help.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...