Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mastal
    replied
    Originally posted by salamay View Post
    I believe so but I am not sure and have asked those responsible for the generation of the data. Would using a nextera kit explain what is seen?
    Yes. There was a recent thread discussing this. I will post a link if I can find it.

    Leave a comment:


  • salamay
    replied
    Originally posted by mastal View Post
    Was the library prep done using a Nextera kit?
    I believe so but I am not sure and have asked those responsible for the generation of the data. Would using a nextera kit explain what is seen?

    Leave a comment:


  • mastal
    replied
    Was the library prep done using a Nextera kit?

    Leave a comment:


  • salamay
    replied
    Originally posted by lac302 View Post
    I've seen the same fluctuation in GC content over the first 20 or so bases on samples run both on the HiSeq and Miseq. I typically have enough coverage to just trim them off even though the Q scores are always above 30.
    Thanks lac302, from what I have done so far I have trimmed the sequences up to bp 16 and worked from there as you seem to have done but I can't figure out the cause for it or whether it is a bit wasteful to trim off 15 bp of useful sequence.

    Leave a comment:


  • lac302
    replied
    I've seen the same fluctuation in GC content over the first 20 or so bases on samples run both on the HiSeq and Miseq. I typically have enough coverage to just trim them off even though the Q scores are always above 30.

    Leave a comment:


  • TonyBrooks
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyBrooks View Post
    I'm assuming these were sequenced on a HiSeq? The spike at 4 cycles is most likely a phenomenon known as Bottom Middle Swath (or BMS in Illumispeak). The HiSeq attempts to find focus before scanning at a fixed point near the inlet port. If a bubble is present over at this point, then there is a mis-focus and that particular swatch is scanned out of focus. You should be able to see if you look at the thumbnail images for cycle 4. Basecalling can't be done on these images, so each cluster is given an N at this position.
    See here for more info

    Bridged amplification & clustering followed by sequencing by synthesis. (Genome Analyzer / HiSeq / MiSeq)

    Leave a comment:


  • salamay
    replied
    Thanks tonybrooks, yes it was on a hiseq. I had not heard about this issue before thanks for bringing it to my attention.

    Leave a comment:


  • TonyBrooks
    replied
    Originally posted by salamay View Post
    I have some metagenomic data obtained from whole genome shotgun sequencing using illumina-hiseq. The reads are 100bp paired end and when I examine the reads in fastqc, I see a couple of things. Firstly, the per base sequence content and per base GC content seem to be very skewed at the beginning of the reads (~ bp 1-16), and the per base N content seems to have a spike at bp 4. As well, I have over represented kmers at the beginning of the reads which do not belong to any adapters (as far as I can tell). I know that these trends are sometimes seen in RNA-seq data due to the (not so) random hexamer priming but I am confused as to why I see this in whole genome data. I am also not sure about the N spike at bp 4. I have attached images of what I mentioned and would appreciate any insight.

    thanks.
    I'm assuming these were sequenced on a HiSeq? The spike at 4 cycles is most likely a phenomenon known as Bottom Middle Swath (or BMS in Illumispeak). The HiSeq attempts to find focus before scanning at a fixed point near the inlet port. If a bubble is present over at this point, then there is a mis-focus and that particular swatch is scanned out of focus. You should be able to see if you look at the thumbnail images for cycle 4. Basecalling can't be done on these images, so each cluster is given an N at this position.

    Leave a comment:


  • salamay
    started a topic FASTQC trends

    FASTQC trends

    I have some metagenomic data obtained from whole genome shotgun sequencing using illumina-hiseq. The reads are 100bp paired end and when I examine the reads in fastqc, I see a couple of things. Firstly, the per base sequence content and per base GC content seem to be very skewed at the beginning of the reads (~ bp 1-16), and the per base N content seems to have a spike at bp 4. As well, I have over represented kmers at the beginning of the reads which do not belong to any adapters (as far as I can tell). I know that these trends are sometimes seen in RNA-seq data due to the (not so) random hexamer priming but I am confused as to why I see this in whole genome data. I am also not sure about the N spike at bp 4. I have attached images of what I mentioned and would appreciate any insight.

    thanks.
    Attached Files

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Multiomics Techniques Advancing Disease Research
    by seqadmin


    New and advanced multiomics tools and technologies have opened new avenues of research and markedly enhanced various disciplines such as disease research and precision medicine1. The practice of merging diverse data from various ‘omes increasingly provides a more holistic understanding of biological systems. As Maddison Masaeli, Co-Founder and CEO at Deepcell, aptly noted, “You can't explain biology in its complex form with one modality.”

    A major leap in the field has
    ...
    02-08-2024, 06:33 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 02-21-2024, 08:52 AM
0 responses
31 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-20-2024, 08:57 AM
0 responses
22 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-14-2024, 09:19 AM
0 responses
55 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-12-2024, 03:37 PM
0 responses
462 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X