Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • biotechkk
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 5

    #1

    Help needed on Fastqc-adapter content

    Dear all,

    i have reads from nextseq 500. I have removed adaptors using fastq-mcf. I run Fastqc for the trimmed reads. I am getting fail result for adapter content,k-mer and per base seqeunce content.
    Whether iam missing any adapters to remove?. I can see the probelm with first 30bp. I have attached adapter seq and screenshopt of fastqc results. Any help will be highly useful to me.

    Thanks

    Regards
    Manoj
    Attached Files
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Is this RNAseq data? The bias seen at the beginning of reads is a common observation because of the "random" primers not being so random (http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthr...t=4846&page=14) and does not need trimming. A similar bias is also seen with tagmentation reactions and is normal.

    Comment

    • biotechkk
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2014
      • 5

      #3
      Thanks. It is exon data. Can i remove first 20bp. Is there any other way to remove that bias. i have mapped with bwa and got mapping quality of 60%. So i need to remove this bias in the beginning of the reads.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Does the mapping quality (60%) refer to the percentage of reads that are mapping? I doubt the low % is because of the first 20 bp but if you want to give it a try you could remove them and see if it improves your mapping.

        What kind of reference genome are you mapping to? Is it a reasonably complete one (e.g. human)?

        More than likely you may have some other issue (primer dimers etc) that may be preventing reads from mapping.

        Comment

        • biotechkk
          Junior Member
          • Jul 2014
          • 5

          #5
          Yes. only 60% of paired reads mapped to human genome(hg19). how to identify primer dimer in my reads and remove those from my reads.

          Comment

          • simonandrews
            Simon Andrews
            • May 2009
            • 870

            #6
            There are two problems here. You have the typical RNA-Seq kmer bias problem at the start of your reads showing up in your Kmer and base composition plots. This isn't something you can fix, or that would be improved by trimming so don't worry about this.

            Secondly you have read-through adapter contamination of your reads as shown by the adapter content plot however this is not produced by the normal common Illumina adapter, but comes from the transposase which Illumina uses to fragment their libraries in some of their kits. This means that your data would benefit from being trimmed to remove this and this will help with the mapping efficiency. You'll need to modify the default options for the trimming program you use to specify that it's the transposase sequence (CTGTCTCTTATA) which you want to remove. Pretty much all trimming programs will allow you to specify this sequence. After trimming you should see the adapter content plot be flat in the trimmed data and hopefully your mapping efficiency will go up too.

            Comment

            • biotechkk
              Junior Member
              • Jul 2014
              • 5

              #7
              Thanks for your help. I have removed the transposase sequence and now i can see the adapter content plot flat. I will map the reads and see the maping quality.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • kinpict.com
                Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by kinpict.com
                The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
                Today, 06:37 PM
              • SEQadmin2
                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by SEQadmin2





                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
                10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
              0 responses
              35 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
              2 responses
              56 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post kinpict.com  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
              0 responses
              175 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...