Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Torst
    replied
    Originally posted by sameet View Post
    Hi All, We are in process of expanding our high-throughput Next Generation Sequencing facility. The sequencer we have. But we are thinking of going for better computing hardware. As far as the budget is concerned we are not running on a 'shoe-string' budget but we will have to justify all the expenses. Any pointers to number of nodes, amount of RAM per node, amount of scratch space per node, total storage and any specific pointers are welcome. Any suggestions?
    As an aside, don't forget that without good staff members to actually analyse the data, a big compute system won't be worth much to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • drlukun
    replied
    I also would like to set up our own analysis platform.
    More detailed information about the whole hardware system provided by company is greatly appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    Merged ymc's separate thread with this. Seems I got an answer to my own question.

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    Do people want to keep hardware discussions in this forum? Do we need a hardware/infrastructure subforum?

    Leave a comment:


  • ymc
    replied
    Building a computer. Please advise

    Hi I am building a system to do SNP calling from raw data and SNP imputation and maybe GWAS also. This is the system I have in mind:

    2 x Intel Xeon E5520
    2 x Intel BXSTS100C 130W CPU Fan for Xeon 5500s
    Intel S5500HCV Board
    3 x Kingston 8GB DDR3-1333 Registered ECC
    LSI Mega RAID SAS 9260-8i
    OS/Apps Storage (RAID0, 2 stripes)
    2 x OCZ 30GB SATA II 64MB Cache SSD OCZSSD2-1VTX30G
    Main Storage (RAID10, 2 stripes, 2 mirrors)
    4 x Hitachi 1TB HDS721010CLA332 SATA II/32MB HDD
    Swap Drive (RAID0, 2 stripes)
    2 x Hitachi 300GB HUS153030VLS300 15K SAS HDD
    Enermax FMA II 535W EG565P-VE DXX 2.2 ATX
    Chenbro CA-SR20964 4-Bays E-ATX Server Case
    -----------------------------------------------
    Total US$4,800

    Do you think this system is an overkill for my purposes? If you were me, how would you fix it? Thanks in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • ymc
    replied
    Originally posted by sameet View Post
    AFAIK the SAS is preferred because of the sheer size of data that needs to be copied across the compute nodes. I think 3 Gbps is just not enough speed. But as a disclaimer, i am not really an expert and probably experts should comment on this, i am making this comment from some experience.
    What do you think about the Seagate 7200RPM SAS 6Gb/s hard drives? Are they better than their SATA 3Gb/s equivalent?

    Or do you think everything should be 15000RPM SAS 6Gb/s in NGS? No place for slow HDD???

    Leave a comment:


  • sameet
    replied
    AFAIK the SAS is preferred because of the sheer size of data that needs to be copied across the compute nodes. I think 3 Gbps is just not enough speed. But as a disclaimer, i am not really an expert and probably experts should comment on this, i am making this comment from some experience.

    Leave a comment:


  • ymc
    replied
    Is SAS hard drive necessary for NGS???

    Is SATA 3Gb/s fast enough for NGS???

    Leave a comment:


  • sameet
    replied
    We are looking at about 2 SOLiD runs per week that will generate to the order of 8 TB data per week, but after post-processing it should reduce to about 100 - 200 GB of usable data. Most of the raw (image) data need not be stored for long term, it may be stored for at the most a month after preliminary analysis.

    The tools are basically open source tools like the velvet pipeline and other chip-sep, rna-seq tools that are standard for the SOLiD. The memory requirements are variable, but they require decently high amounts of memory.

    Leave a comment:


  • thinkRNA
    replied
    I think it will help to know how much data you for see generating on a weekly basis? How long will you need to store the data for your users? The amount of memory required by the tools you are using for analysis.

    We are also thinking about setting up hardware and are doing preliminary analysis of our needs (which seems very variable at this point). So, I would like input from the community on this as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • What would be recommended hardware (computing) for a NGS lab?

    Hi All,

    We are in process of expanding our high-throughput Next Generation Sequencing facility. The sequencer we have. But we are thinking of going for better computing hardware. As far as the budget is concerned we are not running on a 'shoe-string' budget but we will have to justify all the expenses.

    Any pointers to number of nodes, amount of RAM per node, amount of scratch space per node, total storage and any specific pointers are welcome.

    Any suggestions?

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
    by SEQadmin2



    Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
    ...
    07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
    by SEQadmin2



    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
    07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:26 AM
0 responses
10 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
0 responses
33 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...