Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JdeBruin
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 25

    #1

    Results form local blast installation

    Hi,

    I have a local BLAST installation on our cluster, I aslo have the nr database the uniprot and pfam. Currently I have a dataset that when I blast against the nr or uniprot tremble I get no results returned, but when I use the online blast tool I get results, any ideas why this would be happening?

    Thanks!
  • WhatsOEver
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 215

    #2
    Is the latest blast version installed?
    Is the downloaded database up to date?
    Did you use identical parameters? Can you post your command and described which parameters you changed using the online tool?

    Comment

    • JdeBruin
      Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 25

      #3
      This is my blast command:
      ~/apps/blast/bin/blastn -num_threads 15 -query query.fa -db /scratch/sysusers/jurgens/DB/nr -out qeury.blast.nr.out -outfmt "6 qseqid sseqid evalue qstart qend sstart send qseq sseq length mismatch"

      Version :
      blastn: 2.2.29+
      Package: blast 2.2.29, build Mar 18 2014 08:48:30

      I did not change anything on BLAST website just run BLASTN to see if I get any results.

      Comment

      • WhatsOEver
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2012
        • 215

        #4
        Ok, just to make it clear (I have seen a couple of people making this mistake):

        When you say you just run blastn, you mean you click blastn, paste the sequence and go or do you paste the sequence and switch to "Optimize for Somewhat similar sequences (blastn)" under the "Program Selection" point.
        Because the standard setting for the webtool is megablast which gives often different results.

        What about your local database - is it up to date? I wouldn't have any other explanation for the differences as the algorithm and parameters are identical for local and online blastn.

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          @JdeBruin: I assume you are referring to BLAST @NCBI. As WhatsOEver has already said, click on the "Algorithm parameters" at NCBI and then compare the default settings (taking into account choice of blast method you select) to the command line ones you are using. They may not be the same.

          As for the local command line blast have you been able to get results from other searches?

          Comment

          • JdeBruin
            Member
            • Jun 2013
            • 25

            #6
            Yes I am referring to BLAST@NCBI. I have selected for blastn as this is what I have been using on the command line. I have had different dataset produce results just this particular set does not. I will update my nr database as wells as the blast tool set.

            Comment

            • kmcarr
              Senior Member
              • May 2008
              • 1181

              #7
              You may have a database type mismatch. The NCBI "nr" database is a protein (amino acid sequence) database; you can not run blastn with a protein database. I'm surprised your command didn't throw an error if your were trying to run blastn against nr downloaded from NCBI. The database you want to use for a local blastn run is "nt".

              Comment

              • WhatsOEver
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2012
                • 215

                #8
                Originally posted by kmcarr View Post
                You may have a database type mismatch. The NCBI "nr" database is a protein (amino acid sequence) database; you can not run blastn with a protein database. I'm surprised your command didn't throw an error if your were trying to run blastn against nr downloaded from NCBI. The database you want to use for a local blastn run is "nt".
                Yes, that's a good point. When blasting a nucleotide against protein database you will not necessarily get an error as the program just tests for not allowed characters and A,C,G,T are also valid amino acids. The other way around, you will get an error.
                The description on the blast website is, however, also a little misleading, as "nucleotide collection (nr/nt)" is the standard db for blastn. This just refers to its partial non-redundance.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                23 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                0 responses
                23 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                0 responses
                28 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...