Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Olalla
    Member
    • Aug 2014
    • 11

    #16
    Thanks a lot to all for your suggestions. Finally I got the program running, by deleting the bloody white spaces in the read names and then setting -NW:mrnl=80 in MIRA, after that all worked perfectly

    Comment

    • maubp
      Peter (Biopython etc)
      • Jul 2009
      • 1544

      #17
      If you had several lines starting GIMXFMA02G21Y1 but the descriptions were different, something strange has happened. I suspect you still have a problem in your data, and all you have done by editing the read names is avoid MIRA's sanity test without fixing the real problem.

      Comment

      • maubp
        Peter (Biopython etc)
        • Jul 2009
        • 1544

        #18
        Originally posted by Olalla View Post
        So, the read names in my fastq files appear as follows:
        GIMXFMA02G21Y1 length=60 xy=2788_0299 region=2 run=R_2010_06_09_09_17_36_ that is, long names with spaces. So I think that what MIRA is doing is juts taking the first 14 characters as the read name (e.g. GIMXFMA02G21Y1),
        Yes, that is the identifier - everything after the space is an optional description in FASTQ.
        Originally posted by Olalla View Post
        which in fact are repeated among many of the files that I do have (I have found common lines when comparing files including only these names in the lines). However, when I search for common lines in files including all information in headers (like GIMXFMA02G21Y1 length=60 xy=2788_0299 region=2 run=R_2010_06_09_09_17_36_), the output of the search is that there are no common lines between any of the files, so I think that I should first eliminate spaces, maybe replacing them by ":".
        Something is wrong, GIMXFMA02G21Y1 should be unique. What does this give?
        Code:
        grep GIMXFMA02G21Y1 your_file.fastq

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        106 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        125 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...