Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gen2prot
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 68

    #1

    Cannot understand Tophat output... Help!

    Hello All,

    I built an index using Drosophila genes giving the bowtie-build command. This worked just fine and I got the six files. Then I ran Tophat from the same folder using the following command

    tophat --solexa1.3-quals -p 4 GeneIndex path_to_reads

    My reads are unpaired. The output says that the Tophat run was OK. There is nothing in the error file. However in the tophat_out folder, I get the following files and directories.

    File: GeneIndex.fa
    File: left_kept_reads.fq
    Folders: log, tmp

    Within these folders I do not find the files accepted.sam and junctions.bed. What am I doing wrong. Any suggestions?

    Thank you
    Abhijit
  • gen2prot
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 68

    #2
    Hello,

    Tophat seems to have run properly, the error output has no warnings. However the accepted.sam file shows no hits. The junctions.bed file is 1.3 MB. Anyone faced a similar problem?

    Thanks
    Abhijit

    Comment

    • gen2prot
      Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 68

      #3
      Hello,

      Following up on this, I wanted to know if indexing of all genes is possible or not in the first place. My genes.fasta file looks something like this.

      Code:
      >FBgn0034974 type=gene; loc=2R:19969255..19973683; ID=FBgn0034974; name=CG16786; dbxref=FlyBase:FBgn0034974,FlyBase:FBan0016786,FlyBase_Annotation_IDs:CG16786,GB:BI363616,GB:BT001664,GB_protein:AAN71419,GB_protein:AAF47161,GB_protein:AAM68305,UniProt/TrEMBL:Q7JRF0,INTERPRO:IPR011071,EntrezGene:37856,BIOGRID:63435,DroID:FBgn0034974,DRSC:FBgn0034974,FlyAtlas:CG16786-RA,flyexpress:FBgn0034974,FlyMine:FBgn0034974,GenomeRNAi_gene:37856,modMine:FBgn0034974; derived_computed_cyto=60B8-60B9%3B Limits computationally determined from genome sequence between @P{lacW}Phm<up>k07623</up>@%26@P{lacW}tsr<up>k05633</up>@ and @P{EP}EP503@; gbunit=AE013599; MD5=4a28df05c5f7a49b8fd75a28e3b5759e; length=4429; release=r5.27; species=Dmel; 
      CGGATTCGGATTCAGATTCACATTCAGATTCAGATACGTTCGGTTTGGGA
      TTCGGATTCATTCGTTGCCACTCCAGCTCTATGCTCCGCGTTGGACCCAC
      CGATAGCTTGGCTTTCTGCTACAGTTTCATAATTGTCTCGGCCAGCAGCA
      GCGGAGTTCATGATTTCGCTCGGAATATGTTTTAGCCAGATCAGTGCTTG
      GAAAATGCACTTTTGAGCGTGTACGTGTATGTGGCAAGTAGCTGGCGAAC
      GTGAATGAAAACATGAGCTGCCACTGAACGAAACCCACTCTCGAGCTGGA
      AGTGCAAGTGAGTTATCCCGCGGAAGAAAAGAAACTGAATTGATTACCAT
      TACCATTCGCGGAGTAGCAGTCTCGGAATTAAATACCAACGACCCAGACA
      ATACCGAGCCCAGTTCCAAGCTGGAGGCTCAAGCCTTTCTCTATTCAATG
      Do I need to re-import a modified fasta file which has a shorter head information? There seems to be a lot of characters in the header which I cannot understand.

      thanks
      Abhijit

      Comment

      • Thomas Doktor
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 105

        #4
        Hi,

        You should build a new bowtie index of the Drosophila genome and not of the individual genes as TopHat is designed to align RNA-seq reads against a full genome. This might explain the behaviour of TopHat, although it should have aligned some reads after all. Perhaps the characters in the fasta headers are causing trouble or there are too many contigs for TopHat to handle well.

        Comment

        • gen2prot
          Member
          • Apr 2010
          • 68

          #5
          Hi Thomas,

          I ran Tophat on the chromosomes and it works wonderfully. I think the fasta header might be the one to blame, since there are characters such as %@><{} etc. It appeared to me as some sort of construct info. Anyways I removed everything except the name of the sequence, and am building the gene index again. Lets see. However, the gene file that I am building the index from is 85 MB in size containing 14964 genes. You think this may cause a problem? Thanks for your help.

          Abhijit

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • kinpict.com
            Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by kinpict.com
            The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
            Today, 06:37 PM
          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2





            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
          2 responses
          56 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post kinpict.com  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          175 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...