Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rskr
    replied
    I think it is a good approach. There are fewer pseudo genes in the transcriptome, so the alignments are more accurate. Not to mention that splice boundaries, are iffy at best with short reads.

    Leave a comment:


  • mgogol
    replied
    Want to share your script? : ) I'm about to write the same thing. Maybe.

    Leave a comment:


  • golharam
    replied
    I never managed to reproduce the results in the paper. But I do see translocations in other NGS datasets. I used BWA to map the reads to the ENTIRE genome.

    After some discussion here, I'm not convinced mapping to just the known transcriptome is the best approach as novel transcripts may be missed.

    As far as mapping transcript coordinates to genomic coordinates, I wrote a Perl script that uses BioPerl to do this.

    Leave a comment:


  • genomicist
    replied
    Hi golharam! Have you had any success in solving your question, i.e. mapping transcript alignments back to genome coordinates?

    Leave a comment:


  • mrawlins
    replied
    I'm not sure I would trust a transcriptome file, since the inaccuracies in the transcriptome annotation will propagate. The bioinformatics currently available cannot give a perfect transcriptome annotation, and the bias introduced by imperfect annotations may skew your experimental results.

    If you have any capability to do the junction mapping and alternative splicing analysis yourself (i.e., mapping to the genome, not the transcriptome), I would go that route. If that's not an option, be sure your analysis includes a discussion of how the results are skewed by the inaccuracies of the transcriptome annotation.

    Leave a comment:


  • golharam
    replied
    @thinkRNA- Papers is "Integrative analysis of the melanoma transcriptome". I've emailed Mike Berger 3 times w/ no response. I'm a bit annoyed.

    I'll probably just write my own perl script to do the conversion.

    Leave a comment:


  • thinkRNA
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon_Keats View Post
    I'm working on the same issue, guess you are talking about the Berger et al. paper? Setting each read to the genome seems relatively easy with a relational database for the reads that map to an exon, so creating a modified SAM file with genome coordinates is relatively easy. But if this is all you want you can just align to genome. So the ____ issue is the spit reads that cross exon-exon boundaries. How to split them and then how not to double count these split reads if you use it for an expression estimate?
    What is the title of this paper? This is a very intersting methodology of mapping the reads to the "transcriptome" and I am wondering why they need to convert back to the genome?

    Leave a comment:


  • xinchen
    replied
    If you're using Ensembl transcripts, I think Ensembl somewhere stores the set of exons that go into making up each transcript, with corresponding genomic coordinates for exons, so you can probably just write a program to match the numbers there for every transcript.

    Otherwise, you can always do your own alignment with a cDNA alignment program like sim4 or splign

    Leave a comment:


  • kmcarr
    replied
    If you are into BioPerl there is a module, Bio::Coordinate::GeneMapper, which is designed to do transformations between coordinate systems like this.

    Caveats:
    - The documentation for this module is sparse.
    - The module appears to contain a couple of bugs.
    - You really have to grok the BioPerl object model.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon_Keats
    replied
    I'm working on the same issue, guess you are talking about the Berger et al. paper? Setting each read to the genome seems relatively easy with a relational database for the reads that map to an exon, so creating a modified SAM file with genome coordinates is relatively easy. But if this is all you want you can just align to genome. So the ____ issue is the spit reads that cross exon-exon boundaries. How to split them and then how not to double count these split reads if you use it for an expression estimate?

    Leave a comment:


  • golharam
    replied
    I have a FASTA file of transcripts. If the read maps to a transcript, I need to convert the coordinates on the transcript to coordinates on the genome. This shouldn't be too hard as long as I have the name and location of the transcript and where the reads maps to on the transcript.

    I can determine the genomic coordinates based on the annotation of the transcript. I was hoping someone already had a program to do this.

    Leave a comment:


  • john_mu
    replied
    What do you mean by mapped coordinates? I feel that they are the same thing...

    Leave a comment:


  • Converting reads mapped from transcriptome back to genome

    HI - I'm trying to mimic the pipeline of a paper that mapped RNA-Seq reads to the transcriptome, then converted the mapped coordinates to their genomic coordinates.

    Does anyone have an easy way of performing this? I emailed the author but never got a response.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
41 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...