Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • elximo
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2014
    • 5

    GeneMark-ES error: parse_ET.pl line 213 Invalid regression data

    I am trying to run GeneMark-ES on a fungal genome. I get this error only when I include the intron coordinates option --ET.

    When the program starts section ET_B training step, and while creating the symbolic link in the ET_C_1 to ET_B, it crashes in the parsing script with the following error:

    Must input more than one data point! at /home/myname/Applications/GeneMarkES/parse_ET.pl line 213.
    Invalid regression data
    error on call: /home/myname/Applications/GeneMarkES/parse_ET.pl --section ET_C --cfg /home/myname/projectX/Maker/GeneMark/run.cfg --v
    I am using GeneMark-ES Suite version 4.21
    I used tophat2 2.0.13 to perform my alignment


    As recommended, I created the introns file for GeneMark from the tophat alignment using the script /home/myname/Applications/GeneMarkES/bet_to_gff.pl --bet junctions.bed --gff tophat_introns.gff --label Tophat2

    I am running GeneMark using the command

    gmes_petap.pl --ES --fungus --ET tophat_introns.gff --et_score 10 --min_contig 150000 --cores 12 --sequence mydraftgenome.fasta


    Has anyone came across something similar? Meanwhile I am repeating the tophat alignment and will try again.
  • elximo
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2014
    • 5

    #2
    I traced a little into the failing script and apparently the hash with introns gets reduced to just one entry in a noise reduction step, after which the script fails. I am not sure in this case if it is a problem with the tophat output though.

    Comment

    • johnng wang
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2016
      • 1

      #3
      same problem

      hello sir
      when i trying to run GeneMark-ES on a fungal genome, i got a same problem with yours, so i wonder if you get the solution for this? and if you could give me some advises here, thank u for your time !

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...