Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • syintel87
    Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 81

    #1

    tblastx fmt1 Output Interpretation

    Hello,
    While locally running "blastx" with output option "-outfmt 1", I have a question.

    The below is an example of my result. As seen, throughout the outputs, all pairs of anchored proteins are not matched. How can I interpret these non-identical alignment?

    Query_3 477 GSVEYVHMLNGTMCATTRTVCAL 409
    medicagoRALF3 38 .GM.WI.QTKTAT.EGSIAD.M. 60

    Query_4 34 PYHLLLQKFYKT 69
    medicagoRALF11 104 ..NRGCS.Y.RC 115
    Thank you in advance.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by syintel87; 03-06-2015, 08:56 AM.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Are you searching with very short query sequences (like illumina reads)?

    Comment

    • syintel87
      Member
      • Dec 2012
      • 81

      #3
      My query sequences are contigs that are de novo assembled, some of which are short (e.g. 500) whereas others are very long (e.g. 100,000).

      But database of blast is composed of several peptide proteins whose length is short (e.g. 44).

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Have you tried to do the search the other way around (using your peptides as query)?

        Try using BLAT too. Especially if you know that you expect the peptides to be there in your data.

        Comment

        • syintel87
          Member
          • Dec 2012
          • 81

          #5
          In addition to "-outfmt 1", I tried other options as well.
          There seem to be different ways of alignment.

          0 = pairwise
          1 = query-anchored showing identities
          2 = query-anchored no identities
          3 = flat query-anchored, show identities
          4 = flat query-anchored, no identities

          [-outfmt 0]
          Query_2 229 KMSFRYLFFAIKKYALSKF 173
          thalianaRALF4 5 ...LTS...VSIVIV..L. 23

          [-outfmt 1]
          Query_2 229 KMSFRYLFFAIKKYALSKF 173
          thalianaRALF4 5 ...LTS...VSIVIV..L. 23

          [-outfmt 2]
          Query_2 229 KMSFRYLFFAIKKYALSKF 173
          thalianaRALF4 5 KMSLTSLFFVSIVIVLSLF 23

          [-outfmt 3]
          Query_2 229 KMSFRYLFFAIKKYALSKF 173
          thalianaRALF4 5 ...LTS...VSIVIV..L. 23

          [-outfmt 4]
          Query_2 229 KMSFRYLFFAIKKYALSKF 173
          thalianaRALF4 5 KMSLTSLFFVSIVIVLSLF 23
          The results of [-outfmt 2] and [-outfmt 4] may be the results that I look forward to getting. However, I still cannot understand the principles and differences that distinguish output format 0 to 4.

          Comment

          • syintel87
            Member
            • Dec 2012
            • 81

            #6
            Ah, now I see! In formats "0, 1, and 3", dots stand for identities between query and target. And differences are shown with protein letters.

            I should have posted after more consideration.
            Thanks GenoMax! I am going to try "BLAT", too.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • kinpict.com
              Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by kinpict.com
              The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
              Today, 06:37 PM
            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2





              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
              10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
            2 responses
            56 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post kinpict.com  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            175 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...