Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jpummil
    Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 85

    #1

    SOAPdenovo2 .config settings

    So, I recently gave SOAPdenovo2 a try on a large genome assembly which I'd previously been using Velvet and Ray on. I know SOAP was used with great success on te Giant Panda among many others. One setting of question for me right now is the global "maximal read length". I have a number of both PE and MP sets from HiSeq that are 101bp long. But, I also have a set of PE from MiSeq that is 267bp long. It would seem that you would do as instructed and assign max_rd_len to be the 267 number, but does that have an adverse affect on all of the 101bp stuff?


    #maximal read length
    max_rd_len=267

    Couldn't find an example where you set this within the [LIB] parameters for each individual set of data...
  • jpummil
    Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 85

    #2
    Hahaha! 134 views and no responses. OK, I have set up a run with the parameter set inside the [LIB] areas for each read type...we'll see if results are different than with it set globally...STAY TUNED!

    Comment

    • vivek_
      PhD Student
      • Jul 2012
      • 164

      #3
      That seems the best course of action. When I worked with SOAPdenovo or for that matter any de novo assembler, I was advised to generate multiple assemblies with different parameters and retain the one with the best metrics in the end.

      Comment

      • jpummil
        Member
        • Apr 2014
        • 85

        #4
        So, answer is...YUP, it makes a difference!

        Quast results when setting max_rd_len globally and using longest read length for value:

        Assembly horridus.contig
        # contigs (>= 0 bp) 24780968
        # contigs (>= 1000 bp) 215761
        Total length (>= 0 bp) 3052603782
        Total length (>= 1000 bp) 312510366
        # contigs 761946
        Largest contig 9207
        Total length 691019446
        GC (%) 37.43
        N50 938
        N75 687
        L50 249843
        L75 466230
        # N's per 100 kbp 0.00

        Quast results when setting max_rd_len per [LIB] using specific read length for value:

        Assembly horridus.contig
        # contigs (>= 0 bp) 15252819
        # contigs (>= 1000 bp) 329326
        Total length (>= 0 bp) 2030747645
        Total length (>= 1000 bp) 613954195
        # contigs 695060
        Largest contig 15596
        Total length 873677890
        GC (%) 37.08
        N50 1461
        N75 910
        L50 182160
        L75 372629
        # N's per 100 kbp 0.00

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:13 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...