Hey, I've been trying to figure out how to demultiplex paired-end 250 miseq data that has three different barcodes.
The samples all come from 96 well plates. I have two 5' barcodes representing plate number as well as plate column. These two barcodes are linked via a common adapter sequence. I then have one 3' barcode that represents the plate column.
I am fairly sure I would be able to demultiplexing the data in 2 rounds in which I first demultiplex based upon each plate/column combination, and then demultiplex the result based upon the 3' barcode.
This seems fairly cumbersome as I have 2880 unique samples. Is there some sort of software in which I can provide simply the three unique barcodes, and then demultiplex in one step?
Also, I usually use the A5Pipeline (https://code.google.com/p/ngopt/wiki/A5PipelineREADME) to error correct sequence reads, remove Illumina adapter sequences, and assemble the paired-reads. Would I be able to assemble the reads using A5 and then demultiplex the data, or do I have to run the pipeline on each individual sample after first demultiplexing. Thanks!
The samples all come from 96 well plates. I have two 5' barcodes representing plate number as well as plate column. These two barcodes are linked via a common adapter sequence. I then have one 3' barcode that represents the plate column.
I am fairly sure I would be able to demultiplexing the data in 2 rounds in which I first demultiplex based upon each plate/column combination, and then demultiplex the result based upon the 3' barcode.
This seems fairly cumbersome as I have 2880 unique samples. Is there some sort of software in which I can provide simply the three unique barcodes, and then demultiplex in one step?
Also, I usually use the A5Pipeline (https://code.google.com/p/ngopt/wiki/A5PipelineREADME) to error correct sequence reads, remove Illumina adapter sequences, and assemble the paired-reads. Would I be able to assemble the reads using A5 and then demultiplex the data, or do I have to run the pipeline on each individual sample after first demultiplexing. Thanks!
Comment