Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lamz138138
    Member
    • Mar 2015
    • 10

    #1

    Test significant linkage disequilibrium

    Hi, everyone.

    I had read a paper titled "Multiple Instances of Ancient balancing selection shared between humans and chimpanzees". In the paper, there are 59 human individuals (36 females and 23 males) and 10 chimpanzee (9 females and 1 male). After snps were phased, significant LD were defined as follow: "In humans, we used the phased data provided by paper-1 and applied a Chi-square test, considering a p-value less than 0.005 as significant (i.e., r2 > 0.065) (35). For SNPs lacking phase information, we used the genotype data to calculate r2 and took the same cutoff for significance (r2 > 0.065). In chimpanzees, where the sample size is smaller, we applied Fisher’s exact test to the phased data obtained in paper-2 and regarded a p-value less than 0.1 as significant. For the unphased SNPs on the X chromosome, we applied a Chi-square test to the genotype data, considering a p-value less than 0.1 as significant (i.e., r2 > 0.135). "

    I don't know how the threshold were calculated. I had found a formula by google, Chi-square=N*(r-square), and Chi-square(0.05, df-1)=3.84, since there are 59 individuals, so 3.85/59=0.065, am I right? And what about Fisher's exact test and how it was calculated? And how about X chromosome, since it only have one in male, if using above formula in Chi-square, what is N? Also, whether X chromosome in human and chimpanzee all use Chi-square with p-value less than 0.1 or human use Chi-square while chimpanzee still using Fisher's exact test?

    Thanks for any suggestion!

    Best wishes!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...