Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lamz138138
    Member
    • Mar 2015
    • 10

    Test significant linkage disequilibrium

    Hi, everyone.

    I had read a paper titled "Multiple Instances of Ancient balancing selection shared between humans and chimpanzees". In the paper, there are 59 human individuals (36 females and 23 males) and 10 chimpanzee (9 females and 1 male). After snps were phased, significant LD were defined as follow: "In humans, we used the phased data provided by paper-1 and applied a Chi-square test, considering a p-value less than 0.005 as significant (i.e., r2 > 0.065) (35). For SNPs lacking phase information, we used the genotype data to calculate r2 and took the same cutoff for significance (r2 > 0.065). In chimpanzees, where the sample size is smaller, we applied Fisher’s exact test to the phased data obtained in paper-2 and regarded a p-value less than 0.1 as significant. For the unphased SNPs on the X chromosome, we applied a Chi-square test to the genotype data, considering a p-value less than 0.1 as significant (i.e., r2 > 0.135). "

    I don't know how the threshold were calculated. I had found a formula by google, Chi-square=N*(r-square), and Chi-square(0.05, df-1)=3.84, since there are 59 individuals, so 3.85/59=0.065, am I right? And what about Fisher's exact test and how it was calculated? And how about X chromosome, since it only have one in male, if using above formula in Chi-square, what is N? Also, whether X chromosome in human and chimpanzee all use Chi-square with p-value less than 0.1 or human use Chi-square while chimpanzee still using Fisher's exact test?

    Thanks for any suggestion!

    Best wishes!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
53 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...