Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pycnopodia
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 1

    cuffdiff error: Testing for differential expression and regulation in locus = killed

    Hi

    I am trying to run cuffdiff after running cuffmerge but everytime I run my script it gets to Testing for differential expression and regulation in locus and then the program is killed. Each time I run it, the program gets to a different %. Below it shows 0%, last time it ran until 8%.

    I am running cufflinks-2.2.1.Linux_x86_64 on linux mint 17.1 (64 bit).

    I tried to look on the cuffdiff google groups and there is one account of others finding this error (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tuxedo-tools-users/Testing$20for$20differential$20expression$20and$20regulation$20in$20locus.$20killed/tuxedo-tools-users/6c8U6-eJ2sg/dAxdILHZGPkJ), however there is no response from the superusers. So I thought I would try here.

    my script is
    cuffdiff /Ppatens_251_v3.0.gene.gtf -b /ppatens3.fa -N -L "case","control" -o "./diff_quant" --multi-read-correct /caseabundances.cxb /controlabundances.cxb

    and here is the edited output (it was a bit long to post)

    You are using Cufflinks v2.2.1, which is the most recent release.
    [08:57:47] Loading reference annotation and sequence.
    Warning: No conditions are replicated, switching to 'blind' dispersion method
    [08:57:56] Inspecting maps and determining fragment length distributions.
    [09:34:25] Modeling fragment count overdispersion.
    > Map Properties:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Map Properties:
    > Normalized Map Mass: 2254070.93
    > Raw Map Mass: 1700540.11
    > Number of Multi-Reads: 81811 (with 210967 total hits)
    > Fragment Length Distribution: Truncated Gaussian (default)
    > Default Mean: 200
    > Default Std Dev: 80
    [10:33:47] Calculating preliminary abundance estimates
    > Processed 24675 loci. [*************************] 100%
    [16:14:35] Learning bias parameters.
    [20:37:21] Testing for differential expression and regulation in locus.
    > Processing Locus Chr01:672743-675436 [ ] 0%Killed
  • akk
    Junior Member
    • May 2015
    • 1

    #2
    I do have the same errror:

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    [12:19:35] Calculating preliminary abundance estimates
    [12:19:35] Testing for differential expression and regulation in locus.
    > Processing Locus chr15:40439720-40468242 [***************** ] 70%/home/fas/pillai/akk29/.lsbatch/1447167516.290925.shell: line 17: 32415 Killed


    in case you have figured out the problem, please suggest me.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
      by SEQadmin2



      Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
      ...
      Yesterday, 11:10 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
    0 responses
    10 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    14 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    31 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...