Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • satishg
    Member
    • Aug 2014
    • 15

    #1

    TranAbyss-Analyze Error

    Although the paired reads were checked with two different scripts for unpaired reads before running TransAbyss-Analyze, an error saying "the paired-end accessions do not match" is output before aborting. The message essentially says “Paired-end accessions FCC6B7TACXX:7:1101:10524:57301# and FCC6B7TACXX:7:1101:9245:1994# do not match”.

    Command:
    transabyss-analyze -a TrAb_Merged_1_1.fa -1 RG11_NR_P3_R1.fq.gz -2 RG11_NR_P3_R2.fq.gz --SS --ref Gh1 --cfg /work/satishg/transcriptome.cfg --annodir /work/satishg/Gh1.gtf --analyze fusion -o /work/satishg/TrAn_RG11_Gh1 -t 20

    Error Message:
    /work/satishg/TrAn_RG11_Gh1/reads_to_genome/cluster/transabyss.local.sh: line 3: ulimit: core file size: cannot modify limit: Operation not permitted
    GSNAP version 2014-12-29 called with args: gsnap --gunzip -d Gh1 -D /work/satishg -t 18 --format sam -N 1 -m 10 /work/satishg/RG11_NR_P3_R1.fq.gz /work/satishg/RG11_NR_P3_R2.fq.gz
    Checking compiler assumptions for popcnt: 6B8B4567 __builtin_clz=1 __builtin_ctz=0 _mm_popcnt_u32=17 __builtin_popcount=17
    Checking compiler assumptions for SSE2: 6B8B4567 327B23C6 xor=59F066A1
    Checking compiler assumptions for SSE4.1: -103 -58 max=-58 => compiler sign extends
    Finished checking compiler assumptions
    Novel splicing (-N) turned on => assume reads are RNA-Seq
    Paired-end accessions FCC6B7TACXX:7:1101:10524:57301# and FCC6B7TACXX:7:1101:9245:1994# do not match
    real 0m0.623s
    user 0m0.009s
    sys 0m0.056s
    ERROR: Execution of script ended with a non-zero exit-status.

    I tried running it with three different read pairs, but all terminate with the same error.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Have you done something to the original raw data (e.g. trimming) that could potentially have broken the read pairing?

    Have you checked to see if the reads the program is complaining about are present/have no problems.

    Code:
    $ zgrep -A 3 7:1101:10524:57301 your files(R1/R2)

    Comment

    • satishg
      Member
      • Aug 2014
      • 15

      #3
      They show up:

      $ zgrep -A 3 7:1101:10524:57301 RG11_NR_P3_R1.fq.gz
      @FCC6B7TACXX:7:1101:10524:57301#/1
      CCTCATGGATACCAAGCTTGAGGTTCTTTGAGAATGCCTCATAAAACTTGTTGTAATCTTCCTTGTTCTCTGCTATTTCAAAGAAGAG
      +
      giiiiihiiihhiihiihiihiideghiiihihiiifghighhhhhhiihhiafhiihhhhiibgggggedgeeeeeebdddddb`bc

      $ zgrep -A 3 7:1101:9245:1994 RG11_NR_P3_R2.fq.gz
      @FCC6B7TACXX:7:1101:9245:1994#/2
      ACAAGACTCGGCCGCTTAAAAAAACCAGGGTGAAAGCCATGCCTTTCGTTAAAGCTCAAAAGACCAAGGCTTATTTCAAGAGATATCA
      +
      gihiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiibggggeeeaedcddddccccccccccccbcccccccccccccccddddccbccccdcd

      The reads were trimmed and cleaned for rRNA sequences.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Those are not reads from the same fragment (unless you are just showing examples from separate R1 and R2 files).

        Does this show a corresponding read from R2 file?

        Code:
        $ zgrep -A 3 7:1101:10524:57301 RG11_NR_P3_R2.fq.gz

        Comment

        • satishg
          Member
          • Aug 2014
          • 15

          #5
          It does not return anything. What is that supposed to mean?

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            That means the corresponding read was eliminated from R2 file during trimming leaving you with an unmatched read in R1. That is why transabyss is now complaining.

            Use repair.sh from BBMap to remove reads that are singletons.

            Code:
            $ repair.sh in1=r1.fq in2=r2.fq out1=fixed1.fq out2=fixed2.fq outsingle=singletons.fq
            In future you may want to use a trimming program that is paired-end aware (or you should have trimmed the R1/R2 files together) to keep the read pairing intact in R1/R2 files.

            Comment

            • satishg
              Member
              • Aug 2014
              • 15

              #7
              Thanks ! It seems to be clearing out unpaired reads. I used Trimmomatic to trim the reads, followed by running TransAbyss-Analyze. When I got the unpaired reads error, I processed the paired reads once again through a python script to remove unpaired reads, which didn't find any. I shall run the bbmap output reads through TransAbyss-Analyze and get back if I face any other issues.

              Comment

              • GenoMax
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2008
                • 7142

                #8
                BBMap also contains bbduk.sh which is paired-end aware trimming program. Find the thread for bbduk to get additional information.

                Comment

                • whytcs
                  Junior Member
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 2

                  #9
                  Dear GenoMax,

                  recently I also got the same error when I tried to map my RNA-seq data to the mm9 genome,

                  START time : Wed Jul 8 17:43:56 CEST 2015
                  GSNAP version 2014-12-23 called with args: /usr/local/gmap/gmap-2014-12-23/bin/gsnap -t 8 -N 1 -n 1 -A sam -D /data/DIV5/HumGen/WHY/NEO_genome_alignm$
                  Checking compiler assumptions for popcnt: 6B8B4567 __builtin_clz=1 __builtin_ctz=0 _mm_popcnt_u32=17 __builtin_popcount=17
                  Checking compiler assumptions for SSE2: 6B8B4567 327B23C6 xor=59F066A1
                  Checking compiler assumptions for SSE4.1: -103 -58 max=198 => compiler zero extends
                  Finished checking compiler assumptions
                  Novel splicing (-N) turned on => assume reads are RNA-Seq
                  Paired-end accessions FCC6N7WACXX:8:1101:1142:17629# and FCC6N7WACXX:8:1101:1206:2090# do not match

                  and I tried to grep both ID from both R1 and R2 fastq files, and I can get sequence information from both files.

                  For example:
                  grep -A 3 FCC6N7WACXX:8:1101:1206:2090 FCC6N7WACXX-MOUeoqEAAFRAAPEI-207_L8_1.fq

                  @FCC6N7WACXX:8:1101:1206:2090#/1
                  TCTCCTTCAACAACATCAAACTCCACAGTCTCTCCATCGCCTACACTGCGAAGGTACTTCCTGGGGTTATTCTTCTTTATGGCAGTCTGG
                  +
                  bbbeeeeegggggihihiiiiiihiiiigfhiiiiihiiiiiiiiiiihiiiii_egfhihihgggX[adddddd`bcccccccc[bccc

                  grep -A 3 FCC6N7WACXX:8:1101:1206:2090 FCC6N7WACXX-MOUeoqEAAFRAAPEI-207_L8_2.fq
                  @FCC6N7WACXX:8:1101:1206:2090#/2
                  TTGGGAACAGTCAAATGGTTCAATGTAAGGAACGGATACGGTTTCATCAACAGGAATGACACCAAGGAAGACGTATTTGTACACCAGACT
                  +
                  _bbeeeeeggggbefefhghhhhhifgfihdhiiihhiiiieghihhhigfgfghihihiiiiihiggggeeeccccdcbcceccccccc

                  So do you have any clue about this? Many thanks~!

                  Comment

                  • GenoMax
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 7142

                    #10
                    @whytcs: Can you try running repair.sh from BBMap on your files to see if there is a problem somewhere else?

                    Someone had previously reported this error with GSNAP but the context there may not be applicable in your case: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45718

                    Comment

                    Latest Articles

                    Collapse

                    • kinpict.com
                      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                      by kinpict.com
                      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
                      Today, 06:37 PM
                    • SEQadmin2
                      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                      by SEQadmin2





                      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
                      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

                    ad_right_rmr

                    Collapse

                    News

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
                    0 responses
                    28 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
                    0 responses
                    35 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
                    2 responses
                    56 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post kinpict.com  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                    0 responses
                    175 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Working...