Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Karli_40
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 6

    #1

    Questions on Cuffdiff with mapping to transcriptome

    Hi Everyone,

    I have some questions on if my results are valid by using cuffdiff.
    What I did currently is that I did alignment with bowtie to drosophila transcript-r5.55. Unlike common references, this reference is in the format of following:
    >FBtr0086024 type=mRNA; loc=2R:complement(1944862..1947063); ID=FBtr0086024; name=CG7856-RA; dbxref=FlyBase:FBtr0086024,FlyBase_Annotation_IDs:CG7856-RA,REFSEQ:NM_136354; score=11; score_text=Strongly Supported; MD5=7ca9c4371b97aaf7046cf83fefb65eb8; length=2202; parent=FBgn0033056; release=r5.55; species=Dmel;
    GGTAAAGTTGCCTTGGCGTCAGTTGGCAGTTTGGGAAAAGCCTACACACT
    TAATATTTCGATAGATACACTTATTTCGCAATCGTAGAAGATACCACAAA
    TCTCTCTTCCGTAAATTATAAGTATGTCCAAGAGGGTGAGCATCATGTTG
    CCCGACGAAATACCTGCGGCTCCGTCAGGCAGCAGGAGGAACCCGATGCC......
    So when I got the bam file, the column usually indicating chromosome localization is already filled with FBtr#:XXX-XXX (instead of chr1:XXX-XXX) which could be used as annotation.
    I run the bam file in cufflinks to get the GTF file for each file and run cuffmerge to get a merged GTF file for files in the same set of experiment. Then I run cuffdiff with merged GTF file and bam files. I did NOT use any reference GTF files during those steps since the reference for mapping I used is already annotated as I described above. In cuffdiff output file isoform_exp.diff under the column of loci, the value also remained FBtr#:XXX-XXX. It means for each transcript, it is compared in different region. So should I consider if any of the region is differentially expressed, the transcript is differentially expressed? And is this going to affect validity of cuffdiff's calculation since this equals to do assembly first then quantification for differential expression compared to usually it does quantification first then assembly?

    Thanks in advance.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...