Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • igarciacuevas
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2015
    • 1

    Bowtie output files

    Hi!

    I am trying to replicate some biocomputational procedures from a scientific paper related to ChIP-Seq data. When using bowtie as the alligner and introducing the output (specified as .sam format) in the MACS software it tells me that the file format is not recognized.
    However, after converting the unrecognized sam file to bam format using samtools, MACS does recognize the file format and starts analyzing the data.

    Could anyone shed some light on this?

    My bowtie and macs commands are:

    bowtie -m 2 -q -p 24 --sam hg19 File1.fastq File1.sam

    macs14 callpeak -t File1.sam -c ControlFile.sam
    -n ExperimentName -S -g hs --pvalue 1e-9 --keep-dup=auto



    Iñigo
  • westerman
    Rick Westerman
    • Jun 2008
    • 1104

    #2
    Using the --format command in MACS will insist on the input files being in a given format. It is possible that by using the default automatic format detection that MACS got confused by your file.

    That is my best guess and solution.

    Comment

    • blancha
      Senior Member
      • May 2013
      • 367

      #3
      You should switch to MACS2 anyway.
      MACS2 might recognize the format correctly.
      Otherwise, I would specify the format explicitly as westerman suggested, and also check the header and the first entries of the SAM file for any potential problems with the file.

      You're also using 24 threads during the alignment with Bowtie. If you don't have that many processors available, the output can be mixed up. Of course, if you do have the 24 processors available on your machine, then you should be using the 24 threads to do the alignment quickly.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      30 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      44 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      50 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      51 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...