Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hpeitz
    Junior Member
    • May 2010
    • 2

    #1

    Hello and help needed :) from Indiana University

    Hi,

    I am new here because I just recently started to try and use consed and I seem to hit a wall.

    I have 454 data of a 9 Mb prokaryotic genome and try to close the genome. I inherited the project in slightly unfortunate way, now being in possession of a fasta sequence of an assembly with 5 large contigs and a number of very small ones and the complete raw data (all gap closing sanger reads performed so far as well as the initial 454 data and the initial newbler assembly).

    My job is now to start with the initial assembly and add the sanger reads to close the gaps and eventually identify remaining gaps and close the genome.

    So far I have reached the point where I want to use consed to do so. I have obtained a license, installed everything and run through the tour of consed. I managed to open the newbler assemblies in consed and add the existing Sanger reads.

    To my understanding, the next thing I have to do is going to the assembly view and run crossmatch after adding the reads to be able to identify sequence matches between the contig ends from which the Sanger reads start and than arrange and join the contigs accordingly.

    The problem I am facing now is that the assembly view basically freezes whenever I try to scroll after adding the sanger reads (I started with adding 20 reads at a time and I am down now to add them pairwise (1 forward, 1 reverse) at a time).

    I am running consed in a 32 bit Ubuntu Linux environment on a 2.5 Ghz Core2Duo System with 4 GB Ram.

    I wonder if my approach is generally appropriate, if my machine is supposedly sufficient and if the delays are an indication that something with my phred/phrap/consed installation is awry.

    Any advice/comment is highly appreciated and welcome.
  • flxlex
    Moderator
    • Nov 2008
    • 412

    #2
    I hope you don't mind me moving this thread to the Bioinfirmatics forum? It will increase your chance of getting an answer...

    Comment

    • hpeitz
      Junior Member
      • May 2010
      • 2

      #3
      No,

      thats probably a very good idea, thank you,

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...