Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • poisson200
    Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 63

    To cuffcompare or not to cuffcompare

    Dear Bioinformaticians,
    The experiment; RNA-seq, transcriptomics; we simply want to find differentially expressed genes between 2 Illumina samples, case vs. control. No novel transcripts needed, just want to find differentially expressed known genes and/or known transcript isoforms.

    Do I make the right assumption that there is no need to use cufflinks or cuffcompare?
    E.g. Cuffcompare does;
    1) Compare your assembled transcripts to a reference annotation
    2) Track Cufflinks transcripts across multiple experiments
    ????

    Our proposed approach to finding known differentially expressed genes/isoforms:
    1) Run Tophat with a Refseq GTF file on both case and control
    2) Run cuffdiff on both sam files generated from 1 and the GTF file used in 1 as well.

    Please let me know if this is or is not a valid approach?

    Thank you,

    J.
    Last edited by poisson200; 07-29-2010, 04:16 AM.
  • poisson200
    Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 63

    #2
    There are 49 views but nobody knows the answer?


    Or is this is a stupid question?

    Comment

    • Olgy
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 1

      #3
      I would really want to help you, but you know that my knowlage about programming are very small

      Olgy Wolgy

      Comment

      • Enrico Palazzo
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2010
        • 9

        #4
        Originally posted by poisson200 View Post
        Dear Bioinformaticians,
        The experiment; RNA-seq, transcriptomics; we simply want to find differentially expressed genes between 2 Illumina samples, case vs. control. No novel transcripts needed, just want to find differentially expressed known genes and/or known transcript isoforms.

        Do I make the right assumption that there is no need to use cufflinks or cuffcompare?
        E.g. Cuffcompare does;
        1) Compare your assembled transcripts to a reference annotation
        2) Track Cufflinks transcripts across multiple experiments
        ????

        Our proposed approach to finding known differentially expressed genes/isoforms:
        1) Run Tophat with a Refseq GTF file on both case and control
        2) Run cuffdiff on both sam files generated from 1 and the GTF file used in 1 as well.

        Please let me know if this is or is not a valid approach?

        Thank you,

        J.
        Hi J,
        I'm new to this field and this is just a guess:
        I think you have to run cuffcompare on the two GTF files produced in step 2 and your reference annotation file:
        cuffcompare -r Mus_musculus.test.gtf -R -o prefix transcripts1.gtf transcripts2.gtf

        Then you run cuffdiff on the combined output GTF file (from cuffcompare) and the 2 SAM files which had been generated by TopHat in step 1:
        cuffdiff -o diff_out/ combined.gtf accepted_hits1.sam accepted_hits2.sam

        DE genes/isoforms will be in 0_1_gene_exp.diff/0_1_isoform_exp.diff
        but it seems that there is no output for coding sequences as mentioned in an other thread http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4989. If you have trouble with duplicate entries in your reference annotation filles: check this: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3493

        Comment

        • poisson200
          Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 63

          #5
          Thanks Olgy,
          I am sure your intelligence and knowledge of other things is vast.

          ===============================

          Dear Enrico,
          thanks for your answer. I since found out this is the answer to my questions, which are (very similar to yours with the novel and known case)

          1) Known transcripts only; Find differentially expressed known Refseq transcripts between case and control data (no novel transcripts wanted);
          a. Run TopHat on both fastq read files using a GFF file of Refseq
          b. Run cuffdiff on both sam outputs, using a Refseq GTF file

          2) Known and novel transcripts; Find differentially expressed transcripts, both novel and known Refseq
          a. Run TopHat on both fastq (without GFF)
          b. Run cufflinks without GTF file on each SAM file
          c. Run cuffcompare with Refseq.GTF sam1.gtf and sam2.gtf
          d. Run cuffdiff on the combined.GTF and sam files

          Thanks for the link too.

          Kind regards,

          J

          Comment

          • ChrisL
            Member
            • Nov 2009
            • 14

            #6
            No need for Cufflinks or Cuffcompare if you are happy to stick within an existing genome annotation like RefSeq, UCSC or Ensembl. Just take the sam files from Tophat and go straight to Cuffdiff. There is a little trick to get a gtf file that is suitable to use with Cuffdiff with tss id, etc. Just use Cuffcompare and feed it the reference annotation (RefSeq, Ensembl, etc) twice and it will give you a gtf file that is suitable.

            Hope this helps.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              Today, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            29 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...