Originally posted by M4love
View Post
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
error with Bowtie
[QUOTE=Ben Langmead;2022]Hello all,
If you work with large genomes and large sets of short reads, please
take a look at Bowtie (http://bowtie-bio.sf.net), a new open source
short read aligner written by myself and Cole Trapnell at the
University of Maryland. Bowtie is an ultrafast, memory-efficient short
read aligner. It aligns short reads to the human genome at a rate of 25
million reads per hour on a typical workstation with 2 gigabytes of
memory. Bowtie indexes the genome with a Burrows-Wheeler index to keep
its memory footprint small: about 1.3 GB for the human genome. It
supports alignment policies equivalent to Maq and SOAP, but at much
greater speeds.
Hi,
I have no idea if its a right thread to ask this but any suggestion wrt my issue would be appreciated....
I have a fasta file with 109 listed contigs. I am trying to align these contigs against a 3 MB reference genome. First I indexed my reference file and then I used the following command:
./bowtie2 -f -x proteobacter_SL1 -U 454AllContigs.fna -S halo_output_fasta --ignore-quals
I got the following error:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
what(): std::bad_alloc
bowtie2-align died with signal 6 (ABRT)
I have obtained my contig file with 109 contig from a 454 fastq file.
When I tried this fastq against the same indexed reference (offcourse with changed basename), bowtie works perfect but as soon as i changed the tag to -f it throws error.
Is it a memory problem?? coz the cotigs in the contigs file are quite big, close to 12K or 15K bp.
any ideas???????
Comment
-
Originally posted by M4love View Post
If you still can't get Bowtie to work, I would find someone local to give you some lessons in how to use Linux and how to install and use Bowtie.
Good luck!
Comment
-
Originally posted by kumarS_27 View Postyes, its a proper fasta file...the only difference is, which I checked now..the contigs length are close to .3MB and the length gradually decreases till 109th contig.
I am using a 12GB RAM PC.
Can you monitor how much memory your PC is using before it produces the error?
I know Bowtie2 is supposed to not have an upper limit for length of reads, but you might be better off using blast to map the contigs back to the reference genome.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dpryan View PostIn the terminal, bowtie has nothing to do with R.
I would really appreciate if there is a beginners guide or something. Could you please help me out. Thanks a lot.
Comment
-
Bowtie, an ultrafast, memory-efficient, open source short read aligner
Originally posted by M4love View PostHey is there a small tutorial or a book which can teach me bowtie in general. I have read the tutorial which comes with the bowtie software. but that did not teach me the beginner things.
I would really appreciate if there is a beginners guide or something. Could you please help me out. Thanks a lot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mastal View PostThe amount of memory would be plenty if you were mapping short reads to a 3 Mb genome, but with the very long contigs, I don't know.
Can you monitor how much memory your PC is using before it produces the error?
I know Bowtie2 is supposed to not have an upper limit for length of reads, but you might be better off using blast to map the contigs back to the reference genome.
I checked the memory consumption by bowtie-align in the wrapping up stage and it was consuming CPU% 67 VIRT 173MB and RES 52MB, quite alot I would say...but this is with fastq format which was finished successfully. But when I used the fasta, it didnt even appeared in the terminal..and gave me the error.
Anyways, I try with chopping the long length contigs in to smaller one and then see..if it works, it will be clear that Bowtie does have an upper limit on the read length.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kumarS_27 View PostHi,
I checked the memory consumption by bowtie-align in the wrapping up stage and it was consuming CPU% 67 VIRT 173MB and RES 52MB, quite alot I would say...but this is with fastq format which was finished successfully. But when I used the fasta, it didnt even appeared in the terminal..and gave me the error.
Anyways, I try with chopping the long length contigs in to smaller one and then see..if it works, it will be clear that Bowtie does have an upper limit on the read length.
Thanks for suggestions.
Comment
-
Hi all, do any of you know if it is possible to change the matrix which bowtie2 uses for local alignment? If I actually have to alter the source code which part should I be looking at?
I'm trying to use a nucleotide identity matrix that counts T-C and G-A as being the same as T-T and G-G matches.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sinclaircooper View PostHi all, do any of you know if it is possible to change the matrix which bowtie2 uses for local alignment? If I actually have to alter the source code which part should I be looking at?
I'm trying to use a nucleotide identity matrix that counts T-C and G-A as being the same as T-T and G-G matches.
If you have access to a computer cluster and are comfortable compiling source code, I can also send you a program that I wrote that is similar to bismark, but 5-10x faster (just send me a message with your email address). I hope to post the bismark replacement that I wrote this week.
Comment
-
Hi thanks for the advice, the problem that I'm working on isn't acutally a bisuphate treated sample but now that you mention it I think the matrix I'm trying to use is fairly similar. However I need the matrix to allow TC/GA pairing on one 'direction' (i.e. Database to query) but not in the other: a t in the DB sequence can align to either a T or a c in the query...Is this tha same as a bisulphate alignemnt?
Thanks
Comment
-
Originally posted by sinclaircooper View PostHi thanks for the advice, the problem that I'm working on isn't acutally a bisuphate treated sample but now that you mention it I think the matrix I'm trying to use is fairly similar. However I need the matrix to allow TC/GA pairing on one 'direction' (i.e. Database to query) but not in the other: a t in the DB sequence can align to either a T or a c in the query...Is this tha same as a bisulphate alignemnt?
Thanks
Should that not prove to be the best option, presumably bowtie (or any other aligner) could be modified. I'm not particularly familiar with its internals, so I couldn't point you toward the right place in the code to start making changes.
Comment
-
Hi all,
I have used bowtie in paired-end mode. When I checked the results I don't understand the following result:
these are 2 mates, as far as I understand two identical sequences (forward and reverse), which map to chromosome 6, if I map them individually (bowtie -m1 -v2)
1.sam:MISEQ:2:000000000-A26AB:1:1101:17175:1762 0 chr6 72678938 255 77M * 0 0 GGACAATTAAAAAGCAACAACCACAATTAATACGGTTTACACAGGCAAAACTCATTAAGTGTGGGTTGGGGCGCTCT DDDDB9BFFFFF??C;ECFFFEHFFEEGHFGHGFHHHHHFFFGFCCACFHFHHHHHG-ECFBEEECE>>*5+CCHHH XA:i:1MD:Z:76C0 NM:i:1
2.sam:MISEQ:2:000000000-A26AB:1:1101:17175:1762 16 chr6 72678938 255 77M * 0 0 GGACAATTAAAAAGCAACAACCACAATTAATACGGTTTACACAGGCAAAACTCATTAAGTGTGGGTTGGGGCGCTCT CAC-C5-,FFFCAA,C>+A5+-5-AA--CA+C7A9...A-A.EEA,FEAA../A..CC@+@+@@=<+@@==+<,,5, XA:i:1MD:Z:76C0 NM:i:1
however if I run
bowtie-0.12.7/bowtie --phred33-quals -X 2000 --fr --chunkmbs 300 -p 4 -a -v 2 --sam -q -1 1.fq -2 2.fq > paired.sam
the sequence pair is said to be either unmapped or with an insert size of -1109, it should be 0 in this case?
paired.sam:MISEQ:2:000000000-A26AB:1:1101:17175:1762 1:N:0: 77 * 0 0 * * 0 0 GGACAATTAAAAAGCAACAACCACAATTAATACGGTTTACACAGGCAAAACTCATTAAGTGTGGGTTGGGGCGCTCT DDDDB9BFFFFF??C;ECFFFEHFFEEGHFGHGFHHHHHFFFGFCCACFHFHHHHHG-ECFBEEECE>>*5+CCHHH XM:i:0
raw.paired.sam:MISEQ:2:000000000-A26AB:1:1101:17175:1762 147 chr6 72678938 255 77M = 72677906 -1109 GGACAATTAAAAAGCAACAACCACAATTAATACGGTTTACACAGGCAAAACTCATTAAGTGTGGGTTGGGGCGCTCT CAC-C5-,FFFCAA,C>+A5+-5-AA--CA+C7A9...A-A.EEA,FEAA../A..CC@+@+@@=<+@@==+<,,5, XA:i:1 MD:Z:76C0 NM:i:1
If anybody has an idea what I have missed, I would be very grateful.
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Technological advances have led to drastic improvements in the field of precision medicine, enabling more personalized approaches to treatment. This article explores four leading groups that are overcoming many of the challenges of genomic profiling and precision medicine through their innovative platforms and technologies.
Somatic Genomics
“We have such a tremendous amount of genetic diversity that exists within each of us, and not just between us as individuals,”...-
Channel: Articles
05-24-2024, 01:16 PM -
-
by seqadmin
The sequencing world is rapidly changing due to declining costs, enhanced accuracies, and the advent of newer, cutting-edge instruments. Equally important to these developments are improvements in sequencing analysis, a process that converts vast amounts of raw data into a comprehensible and meaningful form. This complex task requires expertise and the right analysis tools. In this article, we highlight the progress and innovation in sequencing analysis by reviewing several of the...-
Channel: Articles
05-06-2024, 07:48 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 05-24-2024, 07:15 AM
|
0 responses
13 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
05-24-2024, 07:15 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 05-23-2024, 10:28 AM
|
0 responses
17 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
05-23-2024, 10:28 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 05-23-2024, 07:35 AM
|
0 responses
21 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
05-23-2024, 07:35 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 05-22-2024, 02:06 PM
|
0 responses
10 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
05-22-2024, 02:06 PM
|
Comment