Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jmartin
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 78

    #1

    Problems running nanocorr error correction w/ illumina reads and pacbio data

    I have an assembly of a nematode genome (~410Mb in size) that was originally created from 454 data, and then later improved with PacBio data using PBJelly. I would now like to try and error correct this data using 30x coverage of Illumina reads and the NANOCORR software, but I'm having some trouble understanding how to run it.

    Looking at the README, I see that I am supposed to run a partition script on what would be the nanopre_reads, but in my case I don't have that. The reads I want to use to improve my assembly are Illumina reads. So should I be partitioning the Illumina reads instead?

    Then, the actual nanocorr command line is basically this:

    nanocorr.py query.fa reference.fa

    and the software README says:
    ++++
    The query file will be "blasted" against each previously partitioned read.
    This query file can be anything useful for correction.
    Illumina data is what is used right now.
    ++++

    So this is what confuses me. I know the typical usage of nanocorr would be to have nanopore reads, illumina reads, and a reference. In my case I have only an assembly that I want to error correct, and illumina reads. Technically I also have PacBio data, but I have already improved my assembly using that data via PBJelly. I just want to error correct this assembly using the illumina data. Can nanocorr help me in this case? A co-worker who recently left said he had been using nanocorr to do this kind of thing, but when I look at it, it seems like this is not the typical usage. And the documentation he left behind is not very complete.

    If anybody here has experience with nanocorr I'd really appreciate some advice.

    Thanks,
    John
  • rhall
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 324

    #2
    Try https://github.com/broadinstitute/pilon which was designed for this task.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    13 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    32 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    0 responses
    45 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    171 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...