Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sulicon
    Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 41

    Vector trimming: are flanking sequences sufficient?

    Hi All,

    I have met a strange problem when using newbler to trim vector sequence. The vector structure is:
    Forward Primer ----> CDNA sequence ---->Reverse Primer

    I was told only the three parts (forward & reverse primer, CDNA) could be sequenced. At first, I just used the flanking sequences, i.e. the primer sequences, for vector trimming (newbler -vt flanking.fa ...). I found some vector sequences remained in the result. For example:

    vector sequence in assembled contig:
    AATGCCAACTTTGTACAAAAAAaGTTGGCACC

    part of the primer sequence:
    AATGCCAACTTTGTACAAAAAAGTTGGCACC

    I don't understand why this sequence haven't been trimmed. The contig just has one additional "a", which should be a sequencing error.

    Then I added the full vector sequence into the file used for trimming. It seems that the result becomes better this time, although there are still some non-CDNA nucleotides appeared in assembled contigs ( I have aligned some of the contigs to reference sequences, and found some terminal nucleotides failed to be aligned)

    I was told the flanking sequences were sufficient for vector trimming, but I observed an improved result by using full vector sequence. Is full vector sequence indeed necessary, or I have made something wrong in vector trimming?


    Thanks in advance!
  • flxlex
    Moderator
    • Nov 2008
    • 412

    #2
    This is not good... It's a bug (I'm pretty sure) with newbler that surprises me. You cannot change the parameters for trimming so I am afraid you are out of luck there. If using the full vector helps then use that!

    One thing to try is collecting the variant sequences of your primers and using them all in your trimming file, that might help...
    Last edited by flxlex; 09-20-2010, 07:03 AM. Reason: Typo

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...