I found this paper that suggests that at >10 cells expression converges to bulk (r = 0.92). But just to follow up, do you all suggest that there is no need to run a bulk sample as QC when running single cell RNA-seq? Obviously we would like to drop the sequencing costs if possible and not needing to sequence the bulk sample would be a relief.
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
I wonder if there is any reference for this.Originally posted by cmbetts View PostGenerally once you're >30 cells the average expression starts to converge on bulk sequencing (Prepared by the same protocol).
Leave a comment:
-
Generally once you're >30 cells the average expression starts to converge on bulk sequencing (Prepared by the same protocol). The issue here is that you can't recreate the 10X protocol on your bulk sample. In my experience with a different 3' scRNA method, you'd be lucky to get a correlation >0.7 compared to bulk conventional RNA-Seq.Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post3- Assuming 10pg RNA/cell your combined total RNA input would be 30 ng. Most bulk RNA-seq kits require minimum 100 ng input so the results will not be comparable.
Leave a comment:
-
I have heard presenters stating this to convince that their single cell data is reliable. I do not see any reason for this justification because of following:
1- Bulk RNA-seq data resulting from the same sample using polyA capture and rRNA depletion are not highly correlated
2- Bulk RNA-seq data resulting from the same sample using two different kits are even less correlated
3- Assuming 10pg RNA/cell your combined total RNA input would be 30 ng. Most bulk RNA-seq kits require minimum 100 ng input so the results will not be comparable.
Leave a comment:
-
Compare bulk RNA-seq with single cell RNA-seq
Hi everyone,
I recently used 10X chromium techniques to do the single cell RNA-seq for my sample. I totally yielded about 3000 cells. I would like to compare the single cell transcriptome profile with the bulk RNA-seq using the same sample to check the consistency (correlation). However, 10X used the 3' sequencing strategy and produced UMI counts but bulk RNA-seq sequenced the whole transcript and produced RPKM. I would like to ask does it make sense to check their consistency with different sequencing strategy/units? If so, what is the best way to do this?
Many thanks in advance!Tags: None
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by kinpict.comThe part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
-
Channel: Articles
Today, 06:37 PM -
-
by SEQadmin2
NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...-
Channel: Articles
10-30-2026, 06:46 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
|
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
|
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
|
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by kinpict.com
Today, 06:49 PM
|
||
|
Genome Sequencing Reveals Large, Repeat-Rich DNA in Trapdoor Spider Named for Stephen Colbert
by SEQadmin2
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
|
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
|
Leave a comment: