Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mohalmoawad
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2019
    • 1

    #1

    Questions regarding the detection of variants (SNPs and Indels) in mammal

    Dear all,

    Greetings,

    I’m a newbie in bioinformatics working currently on my first project regarding detection of variants (SNPs and Indels) in mammal assembly genome. I used the following method to detect variants for non-model organism (Camelus dromedarius), and then predict variants effects:

    1- Downloading two runs of raw sequencing reads in paired end mode using fastq-dump (version 2.9.3).

    2- Raw reads were quality checked, then trimmed using Trimmomatic (version 0.36).

    3- Clean reads were mapped to reference genome using BWA-MEM (version 0.7.15).

    4- Merging SAM files to one big file, converting SAM to BAM, sorting reads by coordinate, and marking duplicate reads using Picard (version 2.20.1).


    5- Create realignment targets using RealignTargetCreator, realign around those targets using IndelRealigner, calling variants for the Base Quality Scoring Recalibration BQSR process using HaplotypeCaller, apply BQSR using two steps of BaseRecalibrator then PrintReads, calling variants using HaplotypeCaller, previous processes were within GATK (version 3.8).

    6- Calling variants again using BCFtools.

    7- Overlapping the two VCF files from HaplotypeCaller and BCFtools mpileup using BEDtools.

    8- Filtering variants using BCFtools.

    9- Select variants SNPs and Indels in two separated files using GATK.

    10- Predicting effects using SnpEff.

    11- SnpEff database was built using reference genome + GTF file which was converted from reference genome GFF version 3 file using gffread.

    Kindly, I would like to share my pipeline with those whom has an experience in related field, to review the above steps conducted on my task, whether it's accurate or still required additional steps, or rearrangement of the pipeline sequence?

    In addition, I would like to share my results with you to make an assessment whether my results are suitable to be reported to my supervisor or not?

    Your response is highly appreciated,

    Kind regards,

    Mohammed Moawad

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Yesterday, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
29 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
71 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...