I'm using BWA MEM to align paired-end fastq files to two reference sequences (50bp and 80bp):
>ref1
TCGTAACGCAAGTTGGATACTCTCGA******************************GGATGTTGCCGTCCTCCTTGAAGT
>ref2
TCGTAACGCAAGTTGGATACTCTCGATTGCAAGTAGTCGATTGCATTGTCAATCTAGGATGTTGCCGTCCTCCTTGAAGT
These two sequences are idential except the middle bit. I then used samtools to filter out properly paired reads from each sequence based on identifiers but surprisingly it showed overwhelming majority of reads have the number of matches that correspond to **ref2** and 0 properly paired reads for **ref1**
I verified this result by repeating the process for each sequence individually and got the same output:
```
$ samtools flagstat mysam.sam
1055596 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
0 + 0 secondary
0 + 0 supplementary
0 + 0 duplicates
20960 + 0 mapped (1.99% : N/A)
1055596 + 0 paired in sequencing
527798 + 0 read1
527798 + 0 read2
0 + 0 properly paired (0.00% : N/A)
20934 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
26 + 0 singletons (0.00% : N/A)
0 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
0 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)
```
I then tried setting high values for gap opens and extension penalties in order to limit the chance that hits from alignments of **ref1** reads result in origin of **ref2**. By doing this, I now can see some properly paired reads from **ref1**. However, one thing I don't understand is that the total number of reads goes up while this number should go down because of gap penalties.
Here are the result (I combined ref1 and ref2 in one file called refx.fasta):
```
bwa mem -O 20 -E 20 refx.fasta R1.fastq.gz R2.fastq.gz > mysam.sam
samtools flagstat mysam.sam
1117216 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
0 + 0 secondary
61620 + 0 supplementary
0 + 0 duplicates
1116527 + 0 mapped (99.94% : N/A)
1055596 + 0 paired in sequencing
527798 + 0 read1
527798 + 0 read2
1053928 + 0 properly paired (99.84% : N/A)
1054666 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
241 + 0 singletons (0.02% : N/A)
6 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
5 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)```
```
bwa mem -O 30 -E 30 refx.fasta R1.fastq.gz R2.fastq.gz > mysam.sam
samtools flagstat mysam.sam
1121698 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
0 + 0 secondary
66102 + 0 supplementary
0 + 0 duplicates
1121007 + 0 mapped (99.94% : N/A)
1055596 + 0 paired in sequencing
527798 + 0 read1
527798 + 0 read2
1053912 + 0 properly paired (99.84% : N/A)
1054662 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
243 + 0 singletons (0.02% : N/A)
6 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
5 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)
```
Can someone explain to me:
1. Is it normal to see 0 properly paired reads in this case?
2. Why does disallowing reads with open and extension gaps increase the total of reads?
Many thanks
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...-
Channel: Articles
10-14-2026, 09:55 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.
We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing...-
Channel: Articles
-
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
0 responses
60 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
|
0 responses
75 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
|
0 responses
74 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
|