Header Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

High gap penalty in BWA

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

SEQanswers June Challenge Has Begun!

The competition has begun! We're giving away a $50 Amazon gift card to the member who answers the most questions on our site during the month. We want to encourage our community members to share their knowledge and help each other out by answering questions related to sequencing technologies, genomics, and bioinformatics. The competition is open to all members of the site, and the winner will be announced at the beginning of July. Best of luck!

For a list of the official rules, visit (https://www.seqanswers.com/forum/sit...wledge-and-win)
See more
See less
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • annguyen
    started a topic High gap penalty in BWA

    High gap penalty in BWA

    I'm using BWA MEM to align paired-end fastq files to two reference sequences (50bp and 80bp):

    >ref1
    TCGTAACGCAAGTTGGATACTCTCGA******************************GGATGTTGCCGTCCTCCTTGAAGT

    >ref2
    TCGTAACGCAAGTTGGATACTCTCGATTGCAAGTAGTCGATTGCATTGTCAATCTAGGATGTTGCCGTCCTCCTTGAAGT

    These two sequences are idential except the middle bit. I then used samtools to filter out properly paired reads from each sequence based on identifiers but surprisingly it showed overwhelming majority of reads have the number of matches that correspond to **ref2** and 0 properly paired reads for **ref1**

    I verified this result by repeating the process for each sequence individually and got the same output:

    ```
    $ samtools flagstat mysam.sam

    1055596 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
    0 + 0 secondary
    0 + 0 supplementary
    0 + 0 duplicates
    20960 + 0 mapped (1.99% : N/A)
    1055596 + 0 paired in sequencing
    527798 + 0 read1
    527798 + 0 read2
    0 + 0 properly paired (0.00% : N/A)
    20934 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
    26 + 0 singletons (0.00% : N/A)
    0 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
    0 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)
    ```
    I then tried setting high values for gap opens and extension penalties in order to limit the chance that hits from alignments of **ref1** reads result in origin of **ref2**. By doing this, I now can see some properly paired reads from **ref1**. However, one thing I don't understand is that the total number of reads goes up while this number should go down because of gap penalties.

    Here are the result (I combined ref1 and ref2 in one file called refx.fasta):

    ```
    bwa mem -O 20 -E 20 refx.fasta R1.fastq.gz R2.fastq.gz > mysam.sam

    samtools flagstat mysam.sam

    1117216 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
    0 + 0 secondary
    61620 + 0 supplementary
    0 + 0 duplicates
    1116527 + 0 mapped (99.94% : N/A)
    1055596 + 0 paired in sequencing
    527798 + 0 read1
    527798 + 0 read2
    1053928 + 0 properly paired (99.84% : N/A)
    1054666 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
    241 + 0 singletons (0.02% : N/A)
    6 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
    5 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)```

    ```
    bwa mem -O 30 -E 30 refx.fasta R1.fastq.gz R2.fastq.gz > mysam.sam

    samtools flagstat mysam.sam

    1121698 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
    0 + 0 secondary
    66102 + 0 supplementary
    0 + 0 duplicates
    1121007 + 0 mapped (99.94% : N/A)
    1055596 + 0 paired in sequencing
    527798 + 0 read1
    527798 + 0 read2
    1053912 + 0 properly paired (99.84% : N/A)
    1054662 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
    243 + 0 singletons (0.02% : N/A)
    6 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
    5 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)
    ```

    Can someone explain to me:

    1. Is it normal to see 0 properly paired reads in this case?
    2. Why does disallowing reads with open and extension gaps increase the total of reads?

    Many thanks
    Last edited by annguyen; 01-15-2021, 02:23 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 08:56 PM
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 07:33 AM
0 responses
74 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 05-31-2023, 07:50 AM
0 responses
114 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 05-26-2023, 09:22 AM
0 responses
118 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X