Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hbt
    Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 20

    #1

    Bowtie and Tophat

    We are currently trying to analyse Solid RNA-seq data using tophat and/or bowtie.
    With default settings tophat is able to align about 35% of reads, whereas bowtie on default is able to align 53%!!
    I'm assuming that tophat first runs bowtie then tried to align reads that span exon splice junctions, how is it therefore aligning less reads that bowtie alone!?
    With some parameter adjustments (i.e. --best flag) we are able to get up to 70% reads mapped using bowtie alone but in doing this we are not able to map the splice junction reads and the --best flag cannot be set for bowtie when running it through tophat.
    Does anyone know if it is possible to get tophat to output only the splice juntion reads (i.e. everything bowtie would not have aligned) so they can be added to the bowtie output, or is there a fairly simple way of altering the bowtie parameters when running it within tophat?

    As you might have guessed, I am only just begining my journey into the worderful world of bioinformatics so go easy on me!

    Any help or advise would be greatly received!!

    Huw
  • hlwright
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 30

    #2
    We also can't understand why tophat is less able to map reads than bowtie despite it using bowtie for the initial mapping?

    Comment

    • adumitri
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 27

      #3
      Hi,

      Hopefully, this is the right place to post my question:

      I ran TopHat v1.2.0 on single reads (40 ntds) generated with Illumina GA IIx. These were the used options:

      tophat --max-multihits 2\
      --segment-mismatches 2\
      --library-type fr-unstranded\
      -p 4\
      -o sample_tophat_out\
      hg19 sample.fastq

      After getting the results, I tried to collect some statistics about the runs. Interestingly, in the generated log folder for each of the samples, there are two files that contain statistics data such as:

      ==> fileq5okX8.log <==
      # reads processed: 28183908
      # reads with at least one reported alignment: 1081639 (3.84%)
      # reads that failed to align: 26764052 (94.96%)
      # reads with alignments suppressed due to -m: 338217 (1.20%)
      Reported 1219857 alignments to 1 output stream(s)

      ==> fileueW7Yw.log <==
      # reads processed: 28183908
      # reads with at least one reported alignment: 20657663 (73.30%)
      # reads that failed to align: 3984728 (14.14%)
      # reads with alignments suppressed due to -m: 3541517 (12.57%)
      Reported 23408344 alignments to 1 output stream(s)

      There is no documentation on TopHat's website on what these two files actually represent. As you can see, the summaries look pretty different - I am not sure why there are two files in the first place, nor do I understand why there is such a large difference between the % of aligned reads.

      There are also two additional files that seem to contain relevant data: reports.log and prep_reads.log. Does anyone know what the results presented in all these files are?

      Thank you so much!
      Alexandra

      Comment

      • ttnguyen
        Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 41

        #4
        Looks like the files in log folder are not much informative. It is quite easy to collect statistics about the mapping by looking at 'accepted_hits.bam'.

        Comment

        • sterding
          Member
          • Sep 2010
          • 36

          #5
          This post helps a lot to the question here:

          http://biostar.stackexchange.com/que...ings-in-tophat

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          36 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...