Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oliver_ngs
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 4

    #1

    Aligning to specific chromosomal regions using BWA.

    Hi,

    I have done some Illumina next generation sequencing after SureSelect target enrichment, and I want to align my reads to a specific region of the genome using BWA.

    My fasta file consist of the specific 3 Mb targeted. If the name in the fasta file is, example >chr7:15000000-18000000, BWA doesn't seem to recognize this as the target interval and assumes the first base is at position one. The alignments are then in the wrong position when I try to import into IGV, and the gene annotations are all incorrect.

    Is there a way of getting BWA to recognize the target interval, so alignment will be given the correct genomic position if I just use part of a chromosome as the reference sequence? Or do I need to align my data to an entire chromosome/genome so that the positions are correct?

    Any suggestion would be very much appreciated!

    Cheers,
    Oliver
  • ttnguyen
    Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 41

    #2
    I think a simple way to do is aligning your data to entire genome then only select the alignments that belong to your specific regions.

    Other way maybe building a new index for your fasta file and then map your reads to this and after mapping step, you need to convert the 'local' coordinate to the 'global' coordinate.

    Comment

    • gaffa
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 82

      #3
      I doubt that you could make BWA assign coordinates differently. But you could possibly change the coordinates yourself in the resulting SAM file, i.e. add 15000000-1 to every coordinate or whatever.

      However, you might want to consider mapping to the whole genome instead, for conceptual reasons. Target enrichment is not 100% efficient, so you are at very high risk of mis-mapping reads if you use only a specific region as your reference.

      There has been some discussion of this on Biostar:
      http://biostar.stackexchange.com/que...xome/7617#7617
      http://biostar.stackexchange.com/questions/4413

      Comment

      • krobison
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2007
        • 734

        #4
        Aligning to a subset of the genome is always a bad idea. Remember that the aligner tries to find the best match between your sequence and the given genome. With a subset, you run a risk of getting an incorrect alignment between your sequence and the restricted reference which would not occur if the aligner had the entire genome (and would therefore find the correct match). The speed improvement you will get will be modest & the downstream informatics more painful.

        If you are really, really stubborn about this, then generate masked versions of your chromosomes where everything except your target regions (and a few hundred basepairs of neighboring sequence) are replaced by N. That way your coordinates are preserved.

        Comment

        • oliver_ngs
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2011
          • 4

          #5
          Thank you all very much for the advice. I'll try aligning to the entire genome. Cheers, Oliver.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          36 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...