Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GenoMax
    replied
    You need to map paired end files together before merging the resulting alignment files using samtools merge.

    Leave a comment:


  • floem7
    replied
    Ok, so I've found samtools merge.

    Leave a comment:


  • floem7
    replied
    So my mapping crashed. Here is my command:
    ~/bin/bbmap/bbwrap.sh in1=hds1r1_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r1_26clean.fastq.gz in2=hds1r2_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r2_26clean.fastq.gz path=/media/mj/c8e2ccd2-6313-4092-be34-46144891720f/agp_v5 unpigz=t pigz=t threads=24 -Xmx100g outm=s68_to_b73v5.bam append showprogress=250000 statsfile=stats_s68_to_b73v5 covstats=covstats_s68_to_b73v5 bs=bs.sh

    Here is the error message
    [E::sam_parse1] no SQ lines present in the header
    samtools view: error reading file "-"
    Exception in thread "Thread-46" java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.IOException: Przerwany potok
    at stream.ReadStreamByteWriter.run(ReadStreamByteWriter.java:32)
    Caused by: java.io.IOException: Przerwany potok
    at java.base/java.io.FileOutputStream.writeBytes(Native Method)
    at java.base/java.io.FileOutputStream.write(FileOutputStream.java:354)
    at java.base/java.io.BufferedOutputStream.write(BufferedOutputStream.java:123)
    at stream.ReadStreamByteWriter.writeSam(ReadStreamByteWriter.java:659)
    at stream.ReadStreamByteWriter.processJobs(ReadStreamByteWriter.java:93)
    at stream.ReadStreamByteWriter.run2(ReadStreamByteWriter.java:42)
    at stream.ReadStreamByteWriter.run(ReadStreamByteWriter.java:28)
    Exception in thread "Thread-49" java.lang.RuntimeException: Writing to a terminated thread.
    at stream.ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.write(ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.java:202)
    at stream.ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.addDisordered(ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.java:197)
    at stream.ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.add(ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.java:97)
    at align2.AbstractMapThread.writeList(AbstractMapThread.java:625)
    at align2.AbstractMapThread.run(AbstractMapThread.java:591)
    MORE REPETITIONS OF SIMILAR BLOCKS

    **************************************************************************
    Warning! 24 mapping threads did not terminate normally.
    Check the error log; the output may be corrupt or incomplete.
    Please submit the full stderr output as a bug report, not just this message.
    **************************************************************************
    I don't have to necesarily use bbwrap, I just wanted to make mapping in elegant way.
    So just to make sure, could I map first pair and second pair of read separately with bbmap and then merge the results (bam files)? I don't have time for more tries, I have been waiting five days for this error.

    Leave a comment:


  • floem7
    replied
    Ok, thanks. I have huge dataset so I will have to wait for results.

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    That would be fine. Looks like you can use `outm=` if you need just mapped reads. I have normally used `out=` with `mappedonly=t` but those two look to be equivalent.

    It should not take 10 days to complete an analysis unless you have a huge dataset.

    Leave a comment:


  • floem7
    replied
    Thanks,

    so can I write:

    bbwrap.sh in1=hds1r1_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r1_26clean.fastq.gz in2=hds1r2_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r2_26clean.fastq.gz ... out=s68_to_b73v5.bam

    ?

    Why I have to use "out" but not "outm"? I want to retain only mapped reads, to keep my file as small as possible.

    It is also interesting, why bbwrap haven't alert that options such as "-in1" are invalid. Some output file has been written but I don't know if it is valid. At least bamqc accepted that file. Nevertheless I'd rather want properly generated file, even if it means that I have to wait for it ten days.
    Last edited by floem7; 05-18-2021, 01:02 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    You can't use `-in1=` those options are simply `in1=` and `in2=` etc. You should also use `out=` not `outm=` if you are writing an alignment file.
    Code:
    bbwrap.sh in1=read1.fq,singleton.fq in2=read2.fq,null out=mapped.sam append

    Leave a comment:


  • floem7
    started a topic bbwrap.sh, is output OK?

    bbwrap.sh, is output OK?

    Hi all,

    I have a library sequenced two times in paierd-end mode.

    I have used bbwrap.sh

    ~/bin/bbmap/bbwrap.sh -in1=hds1r1_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r1_26clean.fastq.gz -in2=hds1r2_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r2_26clean.fastq.gz path=/media/mj/c8e2ccd2-6313-4092-be34-46144891720f/agp_v5 unpigz=t pigz=t threads=24 -Xmx100g outm=s68_to_b73v5.bam showprogress=250000 statsfile=stats_s68_to_b73v5 covstats=covstats_s68_to_b73v5

    If I understand correctly it is possible to provide paired files in -in and -in2

    The procedure proceeded ok, like bbmap.sh, after processing the first pair it printed info, which I expected:

    ------------------ Results ------------------

    Genome: 1
    Key Length: 13
    Max Indel: 16000
    Minimum Score Ratio: 0.56
    Mapping Mode: normal

    Reads: 461959640
    Mapped reads: 455488907
    Mapped bases: 44824369462
    Ref scaffolds: 685
    Ref bases: 2182075994

    Percent mapped: 98.599
    Percent proper pairs: 80.240
    Average coverage: 20.542
    Average coverage with deletions: 27.430
    Standard deviation: 111.219
    Percent scaffolds with any coverage: 100.00
    Percent of reference bases covered: 98.53

    Total time: 393719.639 seconds.

    And later:

    Executing align2.BBMap [build=1, overwrite=true, fastareadlen=500, unpigz=t, pigz=t, threads=24, showprogress=250000, statsfile=stats_s68_to_b73v5, covstats=covstats_s68_to_b73v5, indexloaded=t, in=hds1r1_26clean.fastq.gz, in2=hds1r2_26clean.fastq.gz]
    Version 38.90

    Set threads to 24
    Retaining first best site only for ambiguous mappings.
    No output file.
    Cleared Memory: 0.308 seconds.
    Processing reads in paired-ended mode.
    Started read stream.
    Started 24 mapping threads.
    ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Detecting finished threads: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23

    ------------------ Results ------------------

    Genome: 1
    Key Length: 13
    Max Indel: 16000
    Minimum Score Ratio: 0.56
    Mapping Mode: normal

    Total time: 381683.967 seconds.


    I'm surprised to see "No output file." in the messages above. Also the entire output ended with "total time" and no statistics as for the first read-pair.

    So in the end I wonder if my resulting file is ok (I used outm to get only mapped reads). I.e. does it contain mapped reads from all four files?

    I don't want to test if, for example merged file from separate runs of bbmap for both pairs would give the same number of mapped reads. It would take too much time.
    bbwrap seems ok, but from my point of view it is not enough documented.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
    by SEQadmin2


    Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

    The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
    ...
    07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
    by SEQadmin2



    Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
    ...
    07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
    by SEQadmin2



    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
    07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 12:17 PM
0 responses
10 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:41 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
0 responses
37 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...