Originally posted by ulz_peter
View Post
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Marco
-
Originally posted by marcowanger View PostPeter, I just personally think the current version is still too "advertisement" like.....lingering how to improve. And well, google ranking does not always reflect popularitu, it can be result of search engine optimization....We should focus on how the forum benefit the community as a whole....the idea is already there...Marco
Comment
-
Originally posted by robs View PostThe first two paragraphs look good, but the last one needs some more editing and content. We used about 200 words for the first two paragraphs and have enough left to add more things.
For usage success case, I have a document for that. I previously prepared it for reviewer...i can find it out and paste it here for reference. It is by no means complete, please add more if you know any..Marco
Comment
-
I added some more details to the second paragraph.
As for the use cases, I think the list of publications [2-13] provide sufficient examples.
I think we should try to add some future directions in the last paragraph. Maybe something along the lines of the BioStar "Outlook and Perspectives" part. I will try to add this tomorrow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by robs View PostI added some more details to the second paragraph.
As for the use cases, I think the list of publications [2-13] provide sufficient examples.
I think we should try to add some future directions in the last paragraph. Maybe something along the lines of the BioStar "Outlook and Perspectives" part. I will try to add this tomorrow.Marco
Comment
-
OK, it reads good, but I'd emphasize the 'success' of the platform, which has been driven by the developing technology and the 'information gap' in other media....
i.e.
* NGS takes off.
* Information about NGS becomes crucial asset for everyone.
* Publication / education / conferences / etc. can't keep up.
* Along comes a forum, and takes off in a big way.
** Used in various ways... by various experts...
* Finally:
A forum isn't a traditional scientific medium, but the 'perfect storm' of rapid development in the field, rapid application in the lab, and the slow pace of 'traditional' methods of scientific communication made the forum an ideal communication method for scientists...
As it stands, the paper is like... we made a forum... the forum is big... it is used ... the end.
The key points are the novelty and the success of the site in the scientific arena. People posting results on a forum is unprecedented in recent years, but is exactly what science is about, sharing information.
I don't see the fascination with BioStar. If you start mentioning other projects, the list could be endless. The point of the letter is to emphasize how new and interesting the SEQanswers community is, mentioning the many citations it has already received, how widely used it is, and the cutting edge discussions and announcements that it hosts. e.g. BGI, EBI, NCBI, etc.
Putting the forum in the context of all others projects is a bigger work. Here we need to put the site in the broadest possible context, but nothing else. IMHO.
i.e. If I'm an astrophysicist reading about SEQanswers, what do I want to know? Why am I interested in this project? Do I care because it breaks new ground in building a community around a new field? Or because it's similar to something called BioStar?
Just my 2p.
Dan.
Comment
-
Thank you Dan for the direction of the letter we have to aim.
Originally posted by dan View PostOK, it reads good, but I'd emphasize the 'success' of the platform, which has been driven by the developing technology and the 'information gap' in other media....
i.e.
* NGS takes off.
* Information about NGS becomes crucial asset for everyone.
* Publication / education / conferences / etc. can't keep up.
* Along comes a forum, and takes off in a big way.
** Used in various ways... by various experts...
* Finally:
A forum isn't a traditional scientific medium, but the 'perfect storm' of rapid development in the field, rapid application in the lab, and the slow pace of 'traditional' methods of scientific communication made the forum an ideal communication method for scientists...
As it stands, the paper is like... we made a forum... the forum is big... it is used ... the end.
The key points are the novelty and the success of the site in the scientific arena. People posting results on a forum is unprecedented in recent years, but is exactly what science is about, sharing information.
I don't see the fascination with BioStar. If you start mentioning other projects, the list could be endless. The point of the letter is to emphasize how new and interesting the SEQanswers community is, mentioning the many citations it has already received, how widely used it is, and the cutting edge discussions and announcements that it hosts. e.g. BGI, EBI, NCBI, etc.
Putting the forum in the context of all others projects is a bigger work. Here we need to put the site in the broadest possible context, but nothing else. IMHO.
i.e. If I'm an astrophysicist reading about SEQanswers, what do I want to know? Why am I interested in this project? Do I care because it breaks new ground in building a community around a new field? Or because it's similar to something called BioStar?
Just my 2p.
Dan.Marco
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dan View PostJust my opinion. Feel free to aim in any direction, but the above is what I suggest ;-)
Cheers,
If I'm an astrophysicist reading about SEQanswers, what do I want to know? Why am I interested in this project?Marco
Comment
-
Yeah, I really should.
Here is a rough stab at a new version (just to add to the mix):
Comment
-
Right! I change my mind, excellent paper and looks like a great project (I didn't use it much yet). This should definitely be referenced, as it presents a lot of the arguments that we want to present in a very clear and thoughtful way.
Comment
-
I posted some text suggestions and a partial outline of a direction similar to what Dan suggested.
I actually think that the paper might be better as a traditional journal article rather than a letter to Science/Nature that might not get picked for publishing. Something along the lines of the BioStar paper, except instead of screenshots perhaps some informative information gleamed from the posts over the years.
What do you think of something like Genome Biology or Genome Medicine? I know one of the editors at Genome Medicine and I think there could be interest for a paper like this.
Just a thought.
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Technological advances have led to drastic improvements in the field of precision medicine, enabling more personalized approaches to treatment. This article explores four leading groups that are overcoming many of the challenges of genomic profiling and precision medicine through their innovative platforms and technologies.
Somatic Genomics
“We have such a tremendous amount of genetic diversity that exists within each of us, and not just between us as individuals,”...-
Channel: Articles
05-24-2024, 01:16 PM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 06-03-2024, 06:55 AM
|
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
06-03-2024, 06:55 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 05-30-2024, 03:16 PM
|
0 responses
26 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
05-30-2024, 03:16 PM
|
||
Comprehensive Sequencing of Great Ape Sex Chromosomes Yields Insights into Evolution and Genetic Variability
by seqadmin
Started by seqadmin, 05-29-2024, 01:32 PM
|
0 responses
29 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
05-29-2024, 01:32 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 05-24-2024, 07:15 AM
|
0 responses
216 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
05-24-2024, 07:15 AM
|
Comment