Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • When we submit the paper, we can use the current resolution figures embedded in the document. If the manuscript is accepted, then we need to upload high-res images (1200dpi). I am going to split the figures from their legends. All legends should be on a separate page...

    Comment


    • I like Figure 3 a lot but it is very small and seems to relate to Figure 1. Is there are way we can make it part of Figure 1 and have an (A) and a (B). This will be a better use of space and I think will look better. For example, we could stack them, Figure 1 on top and Figure 3 right underneath and enlarged to be the width of the plot in Figure 1.

      Rob/Marco, are you guys okay with this?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by genericforms View Post
        When we submit the paper, we can use the current resolution figures embedded in the document. If the manuscript is accepted, then we need to upload high-res images (1200dpi). I am going to split the figures from their legends. All legends should be on a separate page...
        Google docs only allows a maximum height/width of 1600px. I can send you higher resolution figures when needed.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by genericforms View Post
          I like Figure 3 a lot but it is very small and seems to relate to Figure 1. Is there are way we can make it part of Figure 1 and have an (A) and a (B). This will be a better use of space and I think will look better. For example, we could stack them, Figure 1 on top and Figure 3 right underneath and enlarged to be the width of the plot in Figure 1.
          I am not sure if we can relate both. Figure 1 shows the activity of forum members (as in contributing to the forum with posts), but figure 3 shows the number of visitors from Google Analytics (which might only be visiting, but not posting).

          Comment


          • Originally posted by robs View Post
            I am not sure if we can relate both. Figure 1 shows the activity of forum members (as in contributing to the forum with posts), but figure 3 shows the number of visitors from Google Analytics (which might only be visiting, but not posting).
            I think we should frame Figure 1 as a summary of the community. The community is made of (A) authors who contribute posts and threads and (B) readers who benefit from the contributions.

            We can comment that we are not confident whether the contributor breakdown mirrors the readership breakdown.

            Then Figure 2 works for showing how fast problems are solved; and this relates to the board enabling fast timescales of innovation.

            Do you think we can do this? Stylistically I think it works better than having a small and out of place Figure 3. And for a compact correspondence it looks better and will be easier to follow I think.

            Let me know if you are okay with this.
            Last edited by adaptivegenome; 12-19-2011, 12:15 PM. Reason: typo

            Comment


            • Originally posted by robs View Post
              Google docs only allows a maximum height/width of 1600px. I can send you higher resolution figures when needed.
              We do not need final figures until the manuscript is accepted.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by genericforms View Post
                I think we should frame Figure 1 as a summary of the community. The community is made of (A) authors who contribute posts and threads and (B) readers who benefit from the contributions.

                We can comment that we are not confident whether the contributor breakdown mirrors the readership breakdown.
                Perhaps this can be addressed as best as possible by looking at

                1. the total number of registered forum members
                against
                2. the number of readers by way of Google Analytics info.

                I have noticed that most times when I log on to the forum, there are many more unregistered/unlogged in readers than members participating during that time. I've always wondered why and if there are really that many "unofficial" readers of the forum. But it would be good to show the numbers which can suggest that useful information posted is being re-read by many, many others. This could support even more thoughtful and complete questions and posts.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Joann View Post
                  Perhaps this can be addressed as best as possible by looking at

                  1. the total number of registered forum members
                  against
                  2. the number of readers by way of Google Analytics info.

                  I have noticed that most times when I log on to the forum, there are many more unregistered/unlogged in readers than members participating during that time. I've always wondered why and if there are really that many "unofficial" readers of the forum. But it would be good to show the numbers which can suggest that useful information posted is being re-read by many, many others. This could support even more thoughtful and complete questions and posts.
                  Take a look at what Rob did now. I like the new Figure 1.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ECO View Post
                    At some point we are going to duplicate Biostar...I haven't thought about how to deal with that, but I think for now it's not "reported post" worthy...?
                    This might be something we could try to address in the Outlook section.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by robs View Post
                      This might be something we could try to address in the Outlook section.
                      when did ECO said this? I couldn't find the exact post...

                      (off-topic), robs, check your Linkedin.
                      Last edited by marcowanger; 12-20-2011, 10:17 AM.
                      Marco

                      Comment


                      • references are added in text for now.
                        Marco

                        Comment


                        • re-writed the introduction part. I hope you will find the argument make sense..

                          Language is rough, but the idea is there
                          Marco

                          Comment


                          • i added examples and comments from Keith's and others' blog and note the debate on recently hot debate on RNA-editing. Interesting, someone continue to cite Li's article without notice the counter-argument proposed in another paper....
                            Marco

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by marcowanger View Post
                              references are added in text for now.
                              This is ideal. Just put the PUBMED ID in parenthesis. I will go back and swap with endnote citations.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by marcowanger View Post
                                re-writed the introduction part. I hope you will find the argument make sense..

                                Language is rough, but the idea is there
                                Looks good!

                                Comment

                                Latest Articles

                                Collapse

                                • seqadmin
                                  Choosing Between NGS and qPCR
                                  by seqadmin



                                  Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) are essential techniques for investigating the genome, transcriptome, and epigenome. In many cases, choosing the appropriate technique is straightforward, but in others, it can be more challenging to determine the most effective option. A simple distinction is that smaller, more focused projects are typically better suited for qPCR, while larger, more complex datasets benefit from NGS. However,...
                                  10-18-2024, 07:11 AM
                                • seqadmin
                                  Non-Coding RNA Research and Technologies
                                  by seqadmin




                                  Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) do not code for proteins but play important roles in numerous cellular processes including gene silencing, developmental pathways, and more. There are numerous types including microRNA (miRNA), long ncRNA (lncRNA), circular RNA (circRNA), and more. In this article, we discuss innovative ncRNA research and explore recent technological advancements that improve the study of ncRNAs.

                                  Nobel Prize for MicroRNA Discovery
                                  This week,...
                                  10-07-2024, 08:07 AM

                                ad_right_rmr

                                Collapse

                                News

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 05:31 AM
                                0 responses
                                10 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post seqadmin  
                                Started by seqadmin, 10-24-2024, 06:58 AM
                                0 responses
                                20 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post seqadmin  
                                Started by seqadmin, 10-23-2024, 08:43 AM
                                0 responses
                                48 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post seqadmin  
                                Started by seqadmin, 10-17-2024, 07:29 AM
                                0 responses
                                58 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post seqadmin  
                                Working...
                                X