During the review of the SEQwiki paper, an important point was raised by the reviewers: the SEQanswers forum has yet to be published, and deserves a good publication.
Why don't we write a letter to Science or Nature about SEQanswers?
The project has already been 'informally' cited dozens of times in the literature, so why not write a nice summary for everyone to cite?
The proposal is to use the wiki to collaboratively draft a letter to Science or Nature (see: wiki:Publication/Letter_for_SEQanswers), with each contributor adding their name to the paper. The final list of authors will be ranked according to (democratically determined) contribution to the final text.
Please contribute (and sign the letter) here!
Meta paper discussion should stay on this thread (wiki sucks for discussion).
Why don't we write a letter to Science or Nature about SEQanswers?
The project has already been 'informally' cited dozens of times in the literature, so why not write a nice summary for everyone to cite?
The proposal is to use the wiki to collaboratively draft a letter to Science or Nature (see: wiki:Publication/Letter_for_SEQanswers), with each contributor adding their name to the paper. The final list of authors will be ranked according to (democratically determined) contribution to the final text.
Please contribute (and sign the letter) here!
Meta paper discussion should stay on this thread (wiki sucks for discussion).
Comment