Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • secda1
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 8

    cuffdiff & significant diffex genes

    Hey guys,

    I've been using cuffdiff (the latest version) to find differentially expressed genes.
    I have 2 conditions and 3 biological replicates for each.
    First i was surprised to see how cuffdiff seems to be, with very little diffex genes identified.

    Then I looked more in details and saw that a lot of genes were not significant though there fold change was really high (and the test status being "OK"), despite having really similar number of reads per condition .
    I am putting an example of 1 gene which is almost not expressed in condition 1 and increase to 13 FPKM in condition 2, and it's still no signicant...

    tracking_id condition replicate raw_frags internal_scaled_frags external_scaled_frags FPKM effective_length status
    XLOC_035496 plus_Pi 0 1.00024 1.18994 1.31993 0.0618412 - OK
    XLOC_035496 plus_Pi 1 0 0 0 0 - OK
    XLOC_035496 plus_Pi 2 0 0 0 0 - OK
    XLOC_035496 minus_Pi 0 473.807 538.184 489.933 14.5036 - OK
    XLOC_035496 minus_Pi 2 676.988 546.757 497.737 14.7058 - OK
    XLOC_035496 minus_Pi 1 420.967 436.014 396.923 12.3208 - OK


    Any suggestions ? or option i should play around ?

    thanks a lot

    David

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...