Header Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

De-Novo transcriptome with 454 Titanium

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

SEQanswers June Challenge Has Begun!

The competition has begun! We're giving away a $50 Amazon gift card to the member who answers the most questions on our site during the month. We want to encourage our community members to share their knowledge and help each other out by answering questions related to sequencing technologies, genomics, and bioinformatics. The competition is open to all members of the site, and the winner will be announced at the beginning of July. Best of luck!

For a list of the official rules, visit (https://www.seqanswers.com/forum/sit...wledge-and-win)
See more
See less
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • flxlex
    replied
    Being a bit focused on newbler, I would wait till the new release which includes a transcriptome module for assembly. It generates transcript variants (for example alternative splice variants) grouped according to gene.

    To be fair, there are certainly other programs out there that might do a good, or even better job, for example Abyss: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19528083 for Illumina reads (perhaps this works also for 454 reads?).

    Leave a comment:


  • yvan.wenger
    replied
    Yep, most of the publications are focused on "pre-titanium"
    technologies and de-novo transcriptome applications are not so
    common... But I bet that even if the scientific litterature is not so
    prolific at this time, many people are currently working on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • krobison
    replied
    If you search PubMed for "454 AND transcriptome" it gets quite a haul; have you found any of those papers useful or are they too dated (a general problem with this field; the technology evolves faster than people can push publications out!)

    Leave a comment:


  • yvan.wenger
    started a topic De-Novo transcriptome with 454 Titanium

    De-Novo transcriptome with 454 Titanium

    Hello everybody,

    Has somebody done transcriptome assemblies with 454 Titanium sequences?

    The goal of my experiment would be to assemble a comprehensive "transcriptome space" and not to do anything quantitative. Based on preliminary experiments, I expect roughly 15'000-20'000 different genes representing between 25x10⁶ and 50x10⁶ Mb refseq-like transcripts (including all possible exons in each reference sequence).

    I*would particularly be interested if someone could advise/speculate on one or several of these points:

    - PolyA enriched samples vs Normalized samples (loss of rare transcripts? efficiency?)

    - Paired end librairies (overlapping maybe? or particular insert sizes?) vs single end librairies

    - The quantity of reads (or plates assuming 1x10⁶ reads per plate) required to signal a good fraction of all the transcripts expressed (e.g 95-98%)

    - The "average" (for the whole sequencing)*or "minimum" (for rare transcripts) coverage required to obtain a good contiguity after de-novo assembly (e.g. 80%+ full length transcripts)

    - The incidence of the points mentioned above on the presence of rare transcripts such as transcription factors in the final assembly.

    Please don't hesitate to point to recent publications or other threads.

    Cheers,

    Yvan

Latest Articles

Collapse

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 01:08 PM
0 responses
6 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 08:56 PM
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 07:33 AM
0 responses
144 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 05-31-2023, 07:50 AM
0 responses
182 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X