Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wisense
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 30

    Some issues about DE genes detection by Cuffdiff

    Hi,guys
    I have some questions in the DE genes detection by using Cuffdiff.
    I have 3 samples of paired-end RNA-seq data(Ct,Is,RP, Ct is an control sample,while Is and Rp are two treated samples), when I use Cuffdiff to find the DE genes among these 3 samples by just using all the tophat results of the 3 samples in an Cuffdiff run, the DE genes results are a bit different from that of using two samples in an Cuffdiff run. The command lines are as follows:

    Use all the 3 samples:
    Code:
    cuffdiff -o diffout_all -L Ct,Is,Rp -p 12 -b mm9.fa mm9.gtf Ct_tophat.bam Is_tophat.bam Rp_tophat.bam > cuffdiff_all.log
    Use 2 samples in one Cuffdiff run and run Cuffdiff 3 times:
    Code:
    cuffdiff -o diffout_CtvsIs -L Ct,Is -p 12 -b mm9.fa mm9.gtf Ct_tophat.bam Is_tophat.bam > cuffdiff_CtvsIs.log 
    cuffdiff -o diffout_CtvsRp -L Ct,Rp -p 12 -b mm9.fa mm9.gtf Ct_tophat.bam Rp_tophat.bam > cuffdiff_CtvsRp.log
    cuffdiff -o diffout_IsvsRp -L Is,Rp -p 12 -b mm9.fa mm9.gtf Is_tophat.bam Rp_tophat.bam > cuffdiff_IsvsRp.log
    Can anyone tell me how does this difference happen? Which way is correct to do DE genes detection when you have this type of data?

    Thanks very much~
    wisense

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    Yesterday, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
9 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
52 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
110 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...