Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AJenkins
    Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 13

    #1

    RNA-seq not showing splice junctions

    I have two RNA-seq data sets. When one is run through Cufflinks I see isoforms but when I run the other I see no isoforms, only single exons/transcripts, none with multiple exons. Further investigating I see that my alignments don't show spanning splice junctions using IGV to visualize. I have attached two png files to show what it should look like (normal.png) and what it does look like (broad.png). Any insights onto why this may be happening?



  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Cufflinks won't be remapping anything, just estimating abundances and looking for new transcripts (among other related things). Have you tried looking at the same area in both alignments? Also, what about just running "samtools view alignments_lacking_apparent_splicing.bam | cut -f 6 | grep N" to double check things, as that'll check for splicing in the whole file instead of you needing to spot-check things.

    Comment

    • dpryan
      Devon Ryan
      • Jul 2011
      • 3478

      #3
      BTW, did you use the same aligner in both cases?

      Comment

      • AJenkins
        Member
        • Nov 2013
        • 13

        #4
        dpryan, I just contacted the institute that aligned the files and the didn't use any splice junction aligned like tophat or PASTA, which I foolishly assumed. As they won't send me the read files as they are "too large" in their words, what is the best way to extract sequences from .bam files that I can run on tophat?

        Comment

        • dpryan
          Devon Ryan
          • Jul 2011
          • 3478

          #5
          Wow, they sounds like assholes. I bet the original reads had crap alignment rates or something, suggesting that the data may be bad to begin with (though you wouldn't be able to see this from the alignments). You can just use the SamToFastq command from picard tools to extract the raw reads for realignment. The bad news is that, since they didn't use a splice-aware aligner (if these really are RNAseq reads, then these people are morons), a lot of the spliced reads probably just didn't align, so they probably aren't included in the BAM file.

          Comment

          • AJenkins
            Member
            • Nov 2013
            • 13

            #6
            I have found the culprit of the problem. It seems that the sequencing institute aligned the reads to the genome, which makes us think that they received reads and then aligned them genome. In actuality the sequencer is automated to align the reads and report a BAM file to indicate possible alignment sites, therefore consolidating data. Using picard to get the sequences to run through the proper Tophat-cufflinks protocol. Thanks for all the help everyone

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...