Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • luida
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 2

    #1

    Bad 260/230 of RNA arising from gel purification

    Otherwise the quality of RNA is ok. But when I size select RNA with PAGE and elute RNA from the gel using 0.3M Sodium Acetate and precipitate with ethanol it results bad 260/230.
    Lower the RNA concentration the worse 260/230 (can be in a range 0.2 - 2). The problem is increased increase 230 and 220 nm reading.
    Wash (even repeated) of EtOH precipitate with 70% ethanol does not increase 260/230.

    Initially the RNA is got with hot phenol treatment followed by ethanol precipitation (in the presence of sodium acetate). But even then in case of low amounts of RNA the 260/230 is good.
    So seams that cause of bad 260/230 is arising from the gel it self (8% PAA 7M Urea TBE):
    I noticed also:
    1) second elution from gel gives better 260/230 for the same RNA concentration.
    2) using NaCl instead of sodium acetate gives slightly better 260/230.

    The question is what is this contaminant ruing 260/230 and how to get rid of it?
    It should not be Urea as in my hands urea does not give similar 230 and 220 nm readings?
    Could it be something from TBE or even acrylamide?

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Today, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
24 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
68 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...