Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by nareshmvr View Post
    sorry i think i made a wrong approach about my confusion in the pre-processing step, how to assess the parameters in pre-processing step for the FASTQC report of a RNA-Seq data .
    Based on your original post it sounds like your data may already be of good quality and may not need additional processing.

    Leave a comment:


  • nareshmvr
    replied
    sorry i think i made a wrong approach about my confusion in the pre-processing step, how to assess the parameters in pre-processing step for the FASTQC report of a RNA-Seq data .

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Take a look at this thread before you decide what to do with the duplicates: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33597

    Leave a comment:


  • nareshmvr
    replied
    thank you max ,

    i have bit experience in using prinseq , am using params -ns_max 0 and derep 14 to remove exact duplicates and ns , please suggest me in this

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    "pre-processing" here is referring to use of a trimming program to scan your samples for adapter contamination? That is always a good idea irrespective of what the initial QC report says. You are not going to lose any information/make things worse by running BBDuk or Trimmomatic on your samples.

    Leave a comment:


  • nareshmvr
    replied
    is my question wrong , please let me know if am wrong

    Leave a comment:


  • Preprocessing for good quality reports of FastQC for RNA-Seq

    Dear all,

    I am newbie to RNA-Seq data analysis(Illumina) , i have done quality check using FASTQC for the RNA-Seq data and now as per the manual for evaluating the FASTQC reports, i got good quality for all the sequences except "sequence duplicates" and "per base sequence content" where in the manual of evaluating the reports they mentioned they can be ignored for RNA-Seq data.

    In some forums i found irrespective of FASTQc reports , its a good idea to preprocess the data. so am confused how to preprocess the data for good quality reports of FASTQC , please suggest me in this about the tools and parameters for preprocessing good quality data , here am sending of my sample in the attachment. please suggest me if am wrong in this.
    Last edited by nareshmvr; 12-30-2014, 01:08 AM. Reason: image not sent

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...