Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • anecsulea
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 12

    problem running TopHat

    Dear all,

    I would like to ask your help with a problem that I've encountered while running TopHat. I wanted to test if the results that I obtain with TopHat are reproducible (if I run the program several times with the same parameters, on the exact same data, do I get the same results ?). This is not the case, I find that sometimes TopHat crashes without warning, and gives only what I call truncated results - i.e. relatively few predicted junctions as compared to what is expected, or to what is found in other runs.

    Here are some details about what I'm doing: I have 76bp-long, single-end reads. I'm using TopHat v1.0.13, with Bowtie 0.12.3, on a Linux computer with x86_64 architecture. I'm running TopHat with the following parameters:

    -p 1 -a 8 -i 40 -m 1 -I 1000000 -F 0 --coverage-search --microexon-search


    For one of the runs where I get truncated results, I have noticed this weird thing in the output:

    [Thu May 27 17:25:49 2010] Mapping reads against segment_juncs with Bowtie
    [Thu May 27 17:25:50 2010] Mapping reads against segment_juncs with Bowtie
    [Thu May 27 17:25:51 2010] Mapping reads against segment_juncs with Bowtie

    The weird thing is that mapping the reads against segment_juncs should take a lot more time, since I have about 20 million reads. So I thought that there might be an error in building the bowtie index for the splice junctions, but the bowtie_build.log shows no erorr. However, I find the following errors in some other log files from the run:

    ############################################

    file18CIUx.log:

    Could not locate a Bowtie index corresponding to basename "/scratch/frt/yearly/necsulea/Orthosplice/results/tophat/Orangutan/Liver_Gelar/tmp/segment_juncs"
    Command: bowtie -q -v 2 -p 1 -k 40 -m 40 /scratch/frt/yearly/necsulea/Orthosplice/results/tophat/Orangutan/Liver_Gelar/tmp/segment_juncs /scratch/frt/yearly/necsulea/Orthos
    plice/results/tophat/Orangutan/Liver_Gelar//tmp/left_kept_reads_seg3.fq

    ############################################

    filebd4xji.log

    Error reading ebwt array: returned 41750080, length was 168445184
    Your index files may be corrupt; please try re-building or re-downloading.
    A complete index consists of 6 files: XYZ.1.ebwt, XYZ.2.ebwt, XYZ.3.ebwt,
    XYZ.4.ebwt, XYZ.rev.1.ebwt, and XYZ.rev.2.ebwt. The XYZ.1.ebwt and
    XYZ.rev.1.ebwt files should have the same size, as should the XYZ.2.ebwt and
    XYZ.rev.2.ebwt files.
    Command: bowtie -q -v 2 -p 1 -k 40 -m 40 /scratch/frt/yearly/necsulea/Orthosplice/results/tophat/Orangutan/Liver_Gelar/tmp/segment_juncs /scratch/frt/yearly/necsulea/Orthos
    plice/results/tophat/Orangutan/Liver_Gelar//tmp/left_kept_reads_seg3.fq


    ############################################

    So it does seem that TopHat cannot read the index files that were built with Bowtie. I do not understand why that would be - has anyone come across the same problem ?

    What I also don't understand is how is it possible that TopHat can still output some junctions (the "truncated" junctions.bed file is not empty, just smaller than on a normal run) if it cannot read the bowtie index for the junction sequences.


    I would be grateful if you can give me some comments or suggestions on how I could solve this problem. Thank you !

    Best,

    Anamaria

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
55 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...