Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nixstix
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2015
    • 2

    Cuffmerge error (GFaSeqGet): subsequence cannot be larger than

    Hi all. I am doing some differential expression calculations using the Tuxedo pipeline. I've take all reference files (GTF, reference genome) from ensembl GChr38.
    So far, I've run Tophat and Cufflinks with no problem. When I try to run Cuffmerge on the data, I get the following error:

    Code:
    Error (GFaSeqGet): subsequence cannot be larger than 632
    Error getting subseq for ENST00000335137 (69091..70008)!
            [FAILED]
    Error: could not execute cuffcompare
    In all my reference files, as well as the GTF files generated by cufflinks, the length of the transcript is 917 bases (69091 - 700008). Where does the "632" in the error message come from? Can anyone offer some insight into how to solve this?

    I've had a look at some other posts with similar issues, but have not been able to solve it. Here are my parameters:

    Code:
    tophat --no-coverage-search --no-novel-juncs -T -p 20 -o th-out --transcriptome-index Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.80 -G Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.80.gtf Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.80 file1.fastq file2.fastq
    
    cufflinks -p 20 -G Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.80.gtf  -o cl-out th-out/accepted_hits.bam
    
    cuffmerge -o cuffmerge -g Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.80.gtf -s Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.80.fa -p 20 assemblies.txt
    Thanks for any help

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
55 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...