Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • qiudao
    Member
    • May 2008
    • 23

    #1

    cufflinks questions

    Dear Friends,

    I am new to RNA-Seq. I have tried to use cufflinks' cuffdiff to compare two aligned data to get differentially expressed transcripts/exons ...

    However if I used:
    cuffdiff -o cuffdiff Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.62.gtf ./read1/accepted_hits.bam ./read2/accepted_hits.bam

    in the "gene_exp.diff", all the "ln(fold change)" is 0.

    If I used assembled "merged.gtf" instead of the above "Homo_sapiens.GRch37.62.gtf", I can get ln(fold change) and p values, everything looks fine, but I can not get annotate gene symbols for each transcript.

    Could someone let me know what's wrong I was doing for the first analysis?
    And
    How could I also obtained the genes annotation for second anlaysis using "merged.gtf"?

    It seems something is wrong. Did I used right gene annotation gtf file? (see below)


    Another question is: what is the human annotation.gtf generally used for cuffdiff? I downloaded it from ensemble (see above), is this the right one?. does it have an equivalent from ucsc genome browser? I had expected cufflinks manual would have specially pointed out where to download this for an example, unfortunately, it has no such info. Maybe in the future it can be added.
    Thanks.




    Thank you very much.



    for your information, I also did cuffcompare between annotation I used an merged.gtf:
    #==========================================
    # Cuffcompare v1.0.3 | Command line was:
    #cuffcompare -o ./cuffcompare -s ./hg18.fa -r ./Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.62.gtf ./merged.gtf
    #

    #= Summary for dataset: ./merge/merged.gtf :
    # Query mRNAs : 65079 in 61573 loci (27950 multi-exon transcripts)
    # (2938 multi-transcript loci, ~1.1 transcripts per locus)
    # Reference mRNAs : 166159 in 50490 loci (145130 multi-exon)
    # Corresponding super-loci: 0
    #--------------------| Sn | Sp | fSn | fSp
    Base level: 0.0 0.0 - -
    Exon level: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Intron level: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Intron chain level: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Transcript level: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Locus level: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Missed exons: 509677/509677 (100.0%)
    Wrong exons: 126588/126588 (100.0%)
    Missed introns: 330351/330351 (100.0%)
    Wrong introns: 62961/62961 (100.0%)
    Missed loci: 0/50490 ( 0.0%)
    Wrong loci: 36503/61573 ( 59.3%)

    Total union super-loci across all input datasets: 61573
    #=================================================
    Last edited by qiudao; 06-05-2011, 09:47 PM. Reason: add another question
  • Morten
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 9

    #2
    Hi.
    I don't know if you managed to solve your problem.
    Anyway, it turned out I had the same problem and your post helped me correct it.
    I was using the same annotation file af you did at first and also got all "ln(fold change)" 0 in "gene_exp.diff".

    I downloaded the UCSC annotation file here:


    I couldn't find it on the UCSC website. (It must be there somehere, though...)
    The annotation file I am linking to worked well for me.

    -Morten

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
      by SEQadmin2



      CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

      Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
      ...
      07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
      by SEQadmin2


      Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

      The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
      ...
      07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 12:22 PM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
    0 responses
    30 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...