Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • burt
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 8

    [Cufflinks] Multi-Hit error

    Hi, I'm running the latest build of Cufflinks (v1.0.3) on an Illumina paired-end RNA-seq library and its throwing me an error.

    [chiakhb@pegasus biasCorrect_multiRead]$ cufflinks --output-dir brain_l8 --num-threads 10 --GTF-guide ~/ref_genome/hg18/misc/hg18.gtf --frag-bias-correct ~/ref_genome/hg18/misc/hg18.fa --multi-read-correct /mnt/ScratchPool/burt/MAQC_HBR/Tophat/brain_l8/accepted_hits.bam
    cufflinks: /lib64/libz.so.1: no version information available (required by cufflinks)
    You are using Cufflinks v1.0.3, which is the most recent release.
    [17:57:40] Loading reference annotation.
    [17:57:44] Inspecting reads and determining fragment length distribution.
    > Processed 135078 loci. [*************************] 100%
    > Map Properties:
    > Total Map Mass: 7131868.26
    > Number of Multi-Reads: 1 (with 458350 total hits)
    > Read Type: 54bp x 54bp
    > Fragment Length Distribution: Empirical (learned)
    > Estimated Mean: 207.08
    > Estimated Std Dev: 23.29
    [18:00:08] Assembling transcripts and initializing abundances for multi-read correction.
    > Processing Locus chr1:227643666-227710711 [** ] 8%
    ERROR: Multi-Hit not found (227634990,227635040).

    Anyone has encountered a similar error?

    Regards
    -burt
  • shrutiisarda
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 2

    #2
    I got the same error, using the GFF guide option..

    Here's what the error looks like..



    chr9:130812841-130820923 Finding a maximum matching to collapse scaffolds
    chr9:130812841-130820923 Will collapse 5 scaffolds
    chr9:130812841-130820923 Starting new collapse round
    chr9:130812841-130820923 Calculating scaffold densities
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    intron: [130820321-130820447], 0
    chr9:130812841-130820923 Creating compatibility graph
    chr9:130812841-130820923 Performing final collapse round
    Extracted 8 contiguous transfrags from 8 scaffolds
    chr9:130812841-130820923 Starting new collapse round
    Convergence reached in 14 iterations
    Importance sampling posterior distribution

    ERROR: Multi-Hit not found (123409527,123409562).


    Brute - force deleting the entry should probably help, but I would like to know why the program crashes for not havin found this multihit, instead of just ignoring it..

    Thanks
    Shrutii

    Comment

    • jgarbe
      Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 14

      #3
      I get the same Multi-Hit error as well while analyzing Illumina paired end data.
      I'm using cufflinks 1.1.0 linked against Boost version 104700 on bam files generated by tophat 1.3.3.
      I'm running command line: cufflinks -p 4 -u -b Sscrofa10.2.fa accepted_hits.bam

      Half of my 10 samples run just fine, 4 fail with the Multi-hit error, and one generates a segmentation fault, all during the MLE step. I have found that I only get these errors when using the -u/--multi-read-correct option (with or without the -b option).

      Comment

      • HilmarBerger
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 4

        #4
        This line in the output

        Number of Multi-Reads: 1 (with 458350 total hits)

        indicates that there is only one multi-mapping read with a huge number of different mappings.
        This could be caused by using the same query name for all reads (or a large part of it) in the input file. Please note that the SAM specification does assume that the string specified in the query name field identifies a read, the only exception being "*" if the query name is unknown.

        Please check the input file and make sure that the query name (first column in SAM output) is either "*" or really something that identifies a read.

        Comment

        • glados
          Member
          • Mar 2012
          • 59

          #5
          I am bumping this few months old thread because I have a similar problem and in need of some help. I also get the "Multi-Hit not found"-error message on one of my test samples when using Cufflinks. I am using the --GTF-guide, --frag-bias-correct, --multi-read-correct and the --upper-quartile-norm parameters.

          Here is the prompt output message:

          Code:
          You are using Cufflinks v1.3.0, which is the most recent release.
          [13:19:01] Loading reference annotation.
          [13:19:02] Inspecting reads and determining fragment length distribution.
          > Processed 66947 loci.                        [*************************] 100%
          > Map Properties:
          >	Upper Quartile: 21.00
          >	Number of Multi-Reads: 386605 (with 950358 total hits)
          >	Fragment Length Distribution: Empirical (learned)
          >	              Estimated Mean: 161.13
          >	           Estimated Std Dev: 42.61
          [13:21:07] Assembling transcripts and initializing abundances for multi-read correction.
          > Processed 66947 loci.                        [*************************] 100%
          [13:35:17] Loading reference annotation and sequence.
          [13:35:27] Learning bias parameters.
          > Processing Locus scaffold_4:12410956-1241332 [***********              ]  44%
          WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (12414511,12416689).
          
          WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (12414511,12416689).
          
          WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (12414511,12416689).
          
          WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (12414511,12416689).
          > Processed 32442 loci.                        [*************************] 100%
          [13:37:20] Re-estimating abundances with bias and multi-read correction.
          > Processing Locus scaffold_4:12410956-1241332 [***********              ]  44%
          WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (12414511,12416689).
          
          WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (12414511,12416689).
          
          WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (12414511,12416689).
          
          WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (12414511,12416689).
          > Processing Locus scaffold_4:12413851-1241839 [***********              ]  44%
          WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (12414511,12416689).
          
          WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (12414511,12416689).
          > Processed 32442 loci.                        [*************************] 100%
          When looking in the gtf-file I can not find a gene spanning those two exact coordinates. Question: Are these warning messages anything I should worry about? And why does it only occur for some samples?

          Comment

          • amitm
            Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 52

            #6
            Originally posted by glados View Post
            I am bumping this few months old thread because I have a similar problem and in need of some help. I also get the "Multi-Hit not found"-error message on one of my test samples when using Cufflinks. I am using the --GTF-guide, --frag-bias-correct, --multi-read-correct and the --upper-quartile-norm parameters.


            When looking in the gtf-file I can not find a gene spanning those two exact coordinates. Question: Are these warning messages anything I should worry about? And why does it only occur for some samples?

            hi glados,
            I am using Cufflinks 2.0.2 with GTF guide, frag-bias-correct, multi-read-correct, total-hits-norm on a Strand-specific human RNA-Seq data.
            I am getting this same warning of multi-hit not found. Did you find answer to your query? As in yours, Cufflinks doesn't terminate, just returns warnings.
            Should these be worried about? I read somewhere that this warning/ error is generated when using multi-read-correct. Is that right?

            Code:
            You are using Cufflinks v2.0.2, which is the most recent release.
            [11:44:02] Loading reference annotation.
            [11:44:06] Inspecting reads and determining fragment length distribution.
            > Processed 155919 loci.                       [*************************] 100%
            > Map Properties:
            >	Normalized Map Mass: 57703206.56
            >	Raw Map Mass: 57703206.56
            >	Number of Multi-Reads: 1548338 (with 3999071 total hits)
            >	Fragment Length Distribution: Empirical (learned)
            >	              Estimated Mean: 157.64
            >	           Estimated Std Dev: 32.05
            [12:03:00] Assembling transcripts and initializing abundances for multi-read correction.
            > Processed 155919 loci.                       [*************************] 100%
            [14:23:07] Loading reference annotation and sequence.
            [14:23:45] Learning bias parameters.
            > Processing Locus chr16:222845-223709         [********                 ]  32%
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            > Processing Locus chr16:226678-227520         [********                 ]  32%
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            > Processing Locus chr8:6844699-6847243        [*********************    ]  85%
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            > Processing Locus chr8:6854287-6856724        [*********************    ]  85%
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            > Processed 26008 loci.                        [*************************] 100%
            [14:41:54] Re-estimating abundances with bias and multi-read correction.
            > Processing Locus chr16:222845-223709         [********                 ]  32%
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            > Processing Locus chr16:576846-577407         [********                 ]  32%
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (226782,227067).
            > Processing Locus chr8:6844699-6847243        [*********************    ]  85%
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            > Processing Locus chr8:6863802-6866346        [*********************    ]  85%
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            
            WARNING: Multi-Hit not found (6854483,6855187).
            > Processed 26008 loci.                        [*************************] 100%

            Comment

            • glados
              Member
              • Mar 2012
              • 59

              #7
              Hello. I did not get any answers to that question, but I did not receive this warning in Cufflinks 2, so for me it's not a problem anymore at least. Hope you figure it out!

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:41 AM
              0 responses
              9 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              22 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
              0 responses
              35 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
              0 responses
              45 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...