Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bhootnaath
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 5

    #1

    BWA puzzle: Read fate is not deterministic?

    A single read, say Read_X, is separately contained in two different fastq files, say A.fq and B.fq.

    Both fastq files were aligned with BWA against three different indexes as follows:

    First against a "human repeats" index. Unmapped reads were then aligned to a "human rRNA" index. The new set of unmapped reads were next aligned to a "human genomic (hg19)" index.

    The bwa commands for all runs were:
    Code:
    bwa aln –l 0 –t 24
    bwa samse –n 1
    Here is the puzzle: BWA treats Read_X differently in the two runs. For A.fq, the read passes through the first two indexes and is caught at (i.e., found to be aligned to) the third index. For B.fq, the read is caught at the first index itself.

    What could be the possible reasons for this behavior? Ideally a given read should have the same fate if passed through the same indexes in the same order, or should it not? Below are the entries in the different SAM files.

    A.fq alignments:
    Code:
    1. "human repeats" SAM entry:
    Read_X  20  Repeat  32  0  43M  *  0  0  <rev comp seq snipped>  <rev qual snipped>  XT:A:R  NM:i:3  X0:i:0  X1:i:0  XM:i:3  XO:i:0  XG:i:0  MD:Z:27C2G4G7  XA:Z:Repeat, -308,43M,3;
    
    2. "human rRNA" SAM entry:
    Read_X  4  *  32  0  43M  *  0  0  <seq snipped>  <qual snipped>
    
    3. "human genomic (hg19)" SAM entry:
    Read_X  16  chr13  93985787  16  43M  *  0  0  <rev comp seq snipped>  <rev qual snipped>  XT:A:U  NM:i:1  X0:i:1  X1:i:5  XM:i:1  XO:i:0  XG:i:0  MD:Z:39C3
    B.fq alignment:
    Code:
    1. "human repeats" SAM entry:
    Read_X  16  Repeat  308  0  43M  *  0  0  <rev comp seq snipped>  <rev qual snipped>  XT:A:R  NM:i:3  X0:i:0  X1:i:0  XM:i:3  XO:i:0  XG:i:0  MD:Z:27C1C9C3  XA:Z:Repeat, -32,43M,3;

    Cheers,
    BN
  • Richard Finney
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 701

    #2
    Might need two more pieces to the puzzle:

    1) Show the full 4 lines for two samples of the read in fastq format (check for Ns)

    2) Show the full sam output, including the variable OPTional fields (field 12 and beyond).
    ___
    edit
    *** okay *** found the tags in your post.

    Both reads did get caught in the REPEAT phase. Read A is getting caught in repeat at "Repeat:32", Read B is at Repeat:308
    BWA will randomly pick an alignment in case of multiple alignments.
    Last edited by Richard Finney; 06-09-2011, 11:39 AM.

    Comment

    • bhootnaath
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2009
      • 5

      #3
      Hi Richard, I think that solves it! Thank you.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
        by SEQadmin2



        CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

        Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
        ...
        Today, 11:01 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
        by SEQadmin2


        Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

        The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
        ...
        07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 02:55 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...