Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • traeki
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 11

    Bowtie/Tophat SAM format detail question

    Hi, there,

    I'm trying to get a clear picture of the semantics of the cigar field for bowtie SAM output.

    My current impression is that the cigar field is listed relative to the plus-strand genome encoding, so that if I have

    Code:
    genome:
    ***   **       <- read alignment
    ATGCCCGTAA
    
    read: 
    AC___CAT
    I'd see the cigar string in the resulting alignment aligning at position 0 with cigar 3M3N2M, even though the alignment actually runs from right to left (i.e. the 16 flag is set). Is this correct? Is this documented anywhere? Is this the intended behavior? I think that's consistent with the existing behavior for the MD:Z: string, I just want to find out if it's something that's going to change under me in future versions, and make sure I haven't misunderstood.

    Incidentally, the bowtie-format alignments' mismatch fields are NOT consistent with this, or even with themselves (the locations are strand-relative, but the reported base transitions are not!!), so I'm pretty sure that's a bug.

    But I'm dealing with SAM output, so I don't really care about the bowtie format. I just want to know the intended semantics for the cigar field in greater detail.

    Thanks,

    -John
    Last edited by traeki; 06-13-2011, 11:02 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...