Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cswarth
    Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 14

    missing reads in IGV display

    Hello all,

    When displaying a BAM file in IGV (1.5.52) I noticed that the coverage track reflects the correct number of reads at a locus but the pileup display below only shows a fraction of the reads. I checked View->Preferences->Alignments and made sure that it was not filtering duplicate reads and not restricting based on quality.

    At one locus the coverage track tells me (correctly) that I have 19 reads, but the pileup display below only shows 10 of them. Another locus has 211000 reads but the pileup shows maybe a couple hundred.

    Is there any way I can control how many reads IGV to displays? I understand it would be difficult for it to display 200K reads at one locus, but it should be able to display 19 of them.

    Thanks in advance for any help.
  • Kennels
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 149

    #2
    I'm not sure if this would apply to your case, but I've had memory limitations with earlier versions of IGV leading to incomplete .bam file loading/refreshing/display of reads, especially if i try zooming in and out. IGV2.0 is out if you want to check if it is a memory issue. It resolved the issue for me.

    Comment

    • cswarth
      Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 14

      #3
      Thanks, upgrading to IGV 2.0 seems to have fixed the problem.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...